Re: [PATCH] rcu: fix some kernel-doc warnings

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>]

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:35:00PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> There are some kernel-doc warnings:
> 
> 	./kernel/rcu/tree.c:2915: warning: Function parameter or member 'count' not described in 'kfree_rcu_cpu'
> 	./include/linux/rculist.h:517: warning: bad line:                           [@right ][node2 ... ]
> 	./include/linux/rculist.h:2: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> 
> Move the comment for "count" to the kernel-doc markup and add
> a missing "*" on one kernel-doc continuation line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/rculist.h | 2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c       | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
> index 2ebd112f86f7..7a6fc9956510 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rculist.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static inline void hlist_replace_rcu(struct hlist_node *old,
>   * @right: The hlist head on the right
>   *
>   * The lists start out as [@left  ][node1 ... ] and
> -                          [@right ][node2 ... ]
> + *                        [@right ][node2 ... ]
>   * The lists end up as    [@left  ][node2 ... ]
>   *                        [@right ][node1 ... ]
>   */

This one has a prerequisite not in my tree, so I dropped this hunk.
Please point me at the prerequisite if it is something that I should
be queueing.

> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 8ed0fe57d5fb..ada4f914fa60 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2895,6 +2895,7 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work {
>   * @monitor_work: Promote @head to @head_free after KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES
>   * @monitor_todo: Tracks whether a @monitor_work delayed work is pending
>   * @initialized: The @lock and @rcu_work fields have been initialized
> + * @count: Number of objects for which GP not started
>   *
>   * This is a per-CPU structure.  The reason that it is not included in
>   * the rcu_data structure is to permit this code to be extracted from
> @@ -2910,7 +2911,6 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu {
>  	struct delayed_work monitor_work;
>  	bool monitor_todo;
>  	bool initialized;
> -	// Number of objects for which GP not started
>  	int count;
>  };
>  

I queued this one.

If this is going up some other path, please feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

And let me know so that I can drop my version.

							Thanx, Paul