linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: chenzhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	John.P.donnelly@oracle.com, prabhakar.pkin@gmail.com,
	bhsharma@redhat.com, horms@verge.net.au, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	xiexiuqi@huawei.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:13:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901171306.GK5561@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e6aebf9-3765-5d8c-933c-698442db1d52@huawei.com>

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 03:07:04PM +0800, chenzhou wrote:
> On 2020/8/10 14:03, Dave Young wrote:
> >>> Previously I remember we talked about to use similar logic as X86, but I
> >>> remember you mentioned on some arm64 platform there could be no low
> >>> memory at all.  Is this not a problem now for the fallback?  Just be
> >>> curious, thanks for the update, for the common part looks good.
> >>
> >> Did you mean this discuss: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/122?
> > I meant about this reply instead :)
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/16/616
> 
> Sorry for not repley in time, I was on holiday last week.
> 
> The platform James mentioned may exist for which have no devices and
> need no low memory.

If there is no memory below 4GB, the arm64 kernel assumes that the
32-bit devices will have some DMA offsets shifting the addresses to the
bottom of the available RAM. So even if RAM starts above 4GB, we
ZONE_DMA32 will be allocated in the bottom 4GB of the high memory (and
if the hardware designers forgot to shift those DMA accesses, we don't
have to support the platform ;)).

So the arm64 notion of low memory differs slightly from the x86 one.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-01 13:08 [PATCH v11 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Chen Zhou
2020-08-01 13:08 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] arm64: kdump: add macro CRASH_ALIGN and CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX Chen Zhou
2020-08-01 13:08 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into crash_core.c Chen Zhou
2020-08-06 13:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-09-01 16:50     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-08  9:59   ` Dave Young
2020-08-01 13:08 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: kdump: reimplement crashkernel=X Chen Zhou
2020-09-02 17:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-03 11:26     ` chenzhou
2020-09-03 13:18       ` chenzhou
2020-09-04  3:04       ` Dave Young
2020-09-04  3:10         ` Dave Young
2020-09-04  4:02           ` chenzhou
2020-09-04  4:16             ` Dave Young
2020-09-04  6:39               ` chenzhou
2020-08-01 13:08 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] arm64: kdump: add memory for devices by DT property linux,usable-memory-range Chen Zhou
2020-08-01 13:08 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel Chen Zhou
2020-08-08 10:02   ` Dave Young
2020-08-10  3:28     ` chenzhou
2020-08-10  5:59       ` Dave Young
2020-08-10  6:03       ` Dave Young
2020-08-18  7:07         ` chenzhou
2020-08-19 12:03           ` Dave Young
2020-08-28  1:59             ` chenzhou
2020-09-01 17:13           ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-09-02 16:42           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-02 17:13   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-03 11:56     ` chenzhou
2020-08-06 11:37 ` [PATCH v11 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200901171306.GK5561@gaia \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=John.P.donnelly@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenzhou10@huawei.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=prabhakar.pkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).