From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FA4C433B4 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F3D60E0C for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232575AbhDZOgq (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:36:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233560AbhDZOgp (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:36:45 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2a.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F256C061756; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2a.google.com with SMTP id g9-20020a4ad3090000b02901ec6daba49aso5504475oos.6; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=1uvxZJv7NEH6OlB0CPMKpMb7Akfa13bCI4rzIGoVg9Q=; b=Zyfy0F0wkpJKZ9NeMFQOcMIoCxL1+3xCAMMZGPv2+Q/bj3I0wih25Z5tYK9a8heIrz zAu/Tn0ZoRs/U8XkmjosQ+5kaTcHc+zBa7f3C9QsM/LM8opUePa0Ul2wCabc33tD1dkX LOmjrozfLmoXm8yJfXTuaC5V5Au80KUeeU2ReZRT+NBH4LdLsT1/EROnDfNIn5hLabSf 66swUVuvEJiZTDpcgqKijo1aaPhDRAVAXTmAFmoeQYj4x0sGGkjs0ejQj4AKKYpXYh9d adq/VzHKxq1a8D4CwVA6Zf13sSIvE2aBzrKgCmvhR32iTgTvcB+HTW0QLQ6XE3OAetEj UYWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1uvxZJv7NEH6OlB0CPMKpMb7Akfa13bCI4rzIGoVg9Q=; b=VxKQMlamO5tRlceAu7y+OajjJ61kJC3UveBxyWpx6hkjKFdmM0x6KFIEnH1C+1TI+3 92+lvLou8HtAW9wlwJJc+yCPddfs7lOOq9zACM3/5hwui+Fj7XuFMxZYgjj9yXKtRUQg WeCV6XF0JEafiUIZldLYyidhskx9Ct1gJEeef5+ZDPctuSptHsI8sIBXnx8F/8tf1Pjz f8S6ZC+sXInANNYHaVmhYIp6MATehOsV0b46UhfEECvG4LfmhIqIaKE61o2ZyrzHQh48 8VwF5kfwxk32AjCXMpG8ylBaSuG0Tyo0XpejGrQWau5RKClMJpmyV9cwvwzE93sV2Kdx Wj1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fceAV3w3h+Ck2gB4Q/44O/DXptWfedjTmXMq0FGm75IjLXSoz w6CeM9S0lLKF72EEtHqURPM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7RjGcfngqk5ns+IfAM26Ogp7/MMZ/3lERy+T3yGgBoyPYs6ERPRB/mA0KfpXBBpv26ocpMA== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:3142:: with SMTP id v2mr13599985oog.9.1619447761416; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm3479054otn.64.2021.04.26.07.36.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:35:59 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Kubern=E1t?= Cc: Jean Delvare , Jonathan Corbet , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (max31790) Rework to use regmap Message-ID: <20210426143559.GA112486@roeck-us.net> References: <20210413025948.901867-1-kubernat@cesnet.cz> <250c1c16-541a-984f-c720-1a8b6176e97e@roeck-us.net> <20210426141745.GA257701@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote: > po 26. 4. 2021 v 16:18 odesílatel Guenter Roeck napsal: > > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version > > > fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting > > > .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped > > > those. > > > > > > By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of > > > weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz", > > > so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm > > > doing something wrong. > > > > > > > Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch > > of the series), or it is something like: > > To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <; > > > > Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series > > which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result > > in the entire series getting lost. > > > > Sorry, I will fix my email-sending procedure. Should I resend the > patch series without the In-Reply-To field? > No, just keep it in mind for next time. Thanks, Guenter