From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com> To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:33:29 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210510163329.GA8567@e120325.cambridge.arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <79223641-6b3e-6b48-50df-3a9c73c003cd@infradead.org> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/28/21 2:32 AM, Beata Michalska wrote: > > Update the documentation bits referring to capacity aware scheduling > > with regards to newly introduced SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL shed_domain > > sched_domain > I guess. > > > flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com> > > --- > > Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst | 6 ++++-- > > Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst > > index 9b7cbe4..92d16e7 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst > > @@ -284,8 +284,10 @@ whether the system exhibits asymmetric CPU capacities. Should that be the > > case: > > > > - The sched_asym_cpucapacity static key will be enabled. > > -- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag will be set at the lowest sched_domain level that > > - spans all unique CPU capacity values. > > +- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL flag will be set at the lowest sched_domain > > + level that spans all unique CPU capacity values. > > +- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag will be set for any sched_domain that spans > > + cpus with any range of asymmetry. > > CPUs > please. > > > > > The sched_asym_cpucapacity static key is intended to guard sections of code that > > cater to asymmetric CPU capacity systems. Do note however that said key is > > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst > > index afe02d3..8fbce5e 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst > > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ section lists these dependencies and provides hints as to how they can be met. > > > > As mentioned in the introduction, EAS is only supported on platforms with > > asymmetric CPU topologies for now. This requirement is checked at run-time by > > -looking for the presence of the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag when the scheduling > > +looking for the presence of the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL flag when the scheduling > > domains are built. > > > > See Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst for requirements to be met for this > > > Thank you for having a look! Fixes applied to v3. --- BR B. > thanks. > -- > ~Randy >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 16:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-28 9:32 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska 2021-04-28 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag Beata Michalska 2021-04-28 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska 2021-05-05 18:17 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-04-28 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits Beata Michalska 2021-04-28 17:19 ` Randy Dunlap 2021-05-10 16:33 ` Beata Michalska [this message] 2021-05-05 18:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210510163329.GA8567@e120325.cambridge.arm.com \ --to=beata.michalska@arm.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).