From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB20C33C9E for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234E32083E for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="MSe05zNS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729085AbgAQDyp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:54:45 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:58496 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729037AbgAQDyp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:54:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=D2eqEc9iWrOC6nuYKXmjMUzCmhTUZW0frYdfgGY7luQ=; b=MSe05zNS4Up8FnibnyD4+SQ7p /4LtR2VOkSRJZ/CtSg8cL/7mon6OmtAuZCyAJKfygQuVyHyFEMUUs4dvPxCnhb7bDisxw2YXkVZmc 4cErl3TezYDcnjHCnjcnC74scJJ47mv8t3VbxRLLKE5MOYghoguWk1MuyfnLYK8ZBlKLpW4EX2NJn Z983NEOQm9at8lFsXomOM4qbWWsloDY7kOKSK9MqAxQIgfEuunVka2cpNXUs2HvXxEX1DM+jYD/v2 XHJekFPAr/A1JoiVv0FZSGNqz+CyQlzyuIxIQapjfI/XdCGcR/uFZPxQh/3rYRIh7jtwXuYCB1/aQ 76mQyRaow==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::ed68] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1isIia-00056b-Pd; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:54:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: fix documentation typos To: Masahiro Yamada , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Michal Marek , Jonathan Corbet , Linux Kbuild mailing list , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bjorn Helgaas References: <20200113232212.138327-1-helgaas@kernel.org> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <26736fee-6e8e-9a05-59c4-6f9d13e31864@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:54:43 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 1/16/20 6:17 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 8:22 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> From: Bjorn Helgaas >> >> Fix a couple typos in kconfig-language documentation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas >> --- >> Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst >> index 74bef19f69f0..f547720bd82d 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst >> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ The two different resolutions for b) can be tested in the sample Kconfig file >> Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02. >> >> Below is a list of examples of prior fixes for these types of recursive issues; >> -all errors appear to involve one or more select's and one or more "depends on". >> +all errors appear to involve one or more "selects" and one or more "depends on". > > > I think "selects" is strange here. I thought so when I read it also. > > "select" is a Kconfig keyword. > select's is intentional, I guess. Yes, I expect so. > Keep it as-is, or perhaps change it into "select" (singular) ? Maybe: Below is a list of examples of prior fixes for these types of recursive issues; -all errors appear to involve one or more select's and one or more "depends on". +all errors appear to involve one or more "select"s and one or more "depends on". -- ~Randy