From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33141C433DF for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE0C204EA for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729374AbgEUVfE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 17:35:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726814AbgEUVfE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 17:35:04 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EA3C061A0E; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jbspg-0002Dw-US; Thu, 21 May 2020 23:34:29 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE9AA100C2D; Thu, 21 May 2020 23:34:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang Cc: Yu-cheng Yu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] selftest/x86: Fix sysret_rip with ENDBR In-Reply-To: <20200521211720.20236-5-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> References: <20200521211720.20236-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20200521211720.20236-5-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 23:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: <878shlt1jw.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Yu-cheng Yu writes: > Insert endbr64 to assembly code of sysret_rip. This changelog explains what the patch does, but not the WHY. It also lacks any information why this is harmless for !CET enabled systems. > Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu > --- Please consult Dave Hansen about the void between your Signed-off-by and the '---' line. Thanks, tglx