From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D9AC7EE2E for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238315AbjFMNAn (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:00:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54854 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236464AbjFMNAm (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:00:42 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBD7191 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 06:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8841635EF for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E79AAC433D2; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:00:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686661240; bh=gqhjdmXTpBiAVW68HBds+hnWsKQm7Yc8GSe81z4kXRU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=I47wTEWG7rUyqCsGy0zpylblH8YaHXHe/M/Krtl7lRtj6GvUN608/u36tVNgo7JiA FRA5yGOVfobw2MCOh+kpDQCUeBogaQZ3HYKfMfUjPvBuP3m5BbjueKFNtWFlYw5oh4 gvMWIycEaK+GDwzqYgKRxOyusNfM2lAidLkRlIy6Xxs1ArAn/gaVoFqB/5KbV2vyFl xdAQ6au0LI86ii3hRnbIDBi3tnRlXa+Hyf/Gv+e/qYYAXZWr5tULxoL2dNA0fyFV7T s8EWNKnyRjYMRywFByc09ZNLjs6fSe2alaH6CioRcEszPNNciDi32z6BbmZgXr8ED7 Z1w8Kz9oc46pA== From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: Conor Dooley , palmer@dabbelt.com Cc: conor@kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, Paul Walmsley , Jonathan Corbet , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: mention patchwork's role In-Reply-To: <20230606-rehab-monsoon-12c17bbe08e3@wendy> References: <20230606-rehab-monsoon-12c17bbe08e3@wendy> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:00:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87mt13ldoq.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Conor Dooley writes: > Palmer suggested at some point, not sure if it was in one of the > weekly linux-riscv syncs, or a conversation at FOSDEM, that we > should document the role of the automation running on our patchwork > instance plays in patch acceptance. > > Add a short note to the patch-acceptance document to that end. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley > --- > I was also not sure if this was the correct doc for this, or whether a > process/maintainer-riscv.rst file was better suited. There's clearly no > rush on this though so =C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF I'm fine with this file. Thanks for adding it! Reviewed-by: Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel