From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF22C47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DCB61284 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235731AbhE0QNZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 12:13:25 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:48194 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235631AbhE0QNY (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 12:13:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0760C2DC; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:11:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 0760C2DC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1622131910; bh=/V6X7dFIwH+ijI90SpG+HfotiquNJzXcSWfeZUVQZJU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=d4sZZsiXsjR2ff82rfNhnB14MI3OXov3P55fHna4KA21wAeFbZui72REPTg5lySqP OSq3SCgJMMe+2aIQp6Dr5ihJVsgUwJcdGzLj8iS7wofTjHx0tTqVRGmpqmHnmlswsq TggGdvTgB6gMubKiDQWBeX0d/EzpH+YFcZbeyRAqHjfckcwaWE0w0ufBU+oO1ZhRn/ 5pM6nZlmwCkvbdzZ5APkxdie6RyxAO37WQtDPdbnVae3FJ6GNTQHZM6tSfoGgZfBHQ waZWnn7euw3aCgqUhmU1zOdQ8KLu0zbRK4LgD11Qs2WZis5CY3VWHsc3Ddkavgm0Bl d2VZX73kNcmiA== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Barry Song , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Barry Song Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: kernel-parameters: mark numa=off is supported by a bundle of architectures In-Reply-To: <20210524051715.13604-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> References: <20210524051715.13604-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 10:11:49 -0600 Message-ID: <87v9742m2i.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Barry Song writes: > risc-v and arm64 support numa=off by common arch_numa_init() > in drivers/base/arch_numa.c. x86, ppc, mips, sparc support it > by arch-level early_param. > numa=off is widely used in linux distributions. it is better > to document it. > > Signed-off-by: Barry Song > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Applied, thanks. jon