From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E89C433B4 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA9B611CA for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236375AbhEQK1b (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2021 06:27:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42030 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236283AbhEQK1a (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2021 06:27:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AAD1C06174A for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 03:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w15so6518975ljo.10 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 03:26:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TABM48q860KIIr5PxtnzEvdl0N8ZAcbff2DSZQYX9FQ=; b=DFOwNqZzH3LgNcrSdw/Uy8RJXi0IHbACsyD2QcUBdAuGL9d+Rl46Gs27xrsbnYwctP PY5UAYk6szw/UjjC+5Km++3YZdlzR29hatmAM5g1n5uEsVTU4F1THp6bJiNu1NbfsGx2 evh3lkswyVPbI0feh8liiShu0AeCLPlxOiZxziy6AQ487e/nXzl/CK1/Hh0Ocf6/Vgag dRejebsGWU2W3Ji8rQ4HYrw44vjdolffNxMOQTgML6z4x+sigvg+TePqtEvstpIGoJ7M njEFushs67lFinE8EuLgKo5JGGoB8KxZYJvuyxtO1gXojCDrGVi1srnyteXk2SC0bMO4 B1eA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TABM48q860KIIr5PxtnzEvdl0N8ZAcbff2DSZQYX9FQ=; b=PFq+sNTyuCe+9wKjdmIotKR9btd2fASFaSxn7R9FnuZzovB6xBCCk53zhQ9UgHzSrQ t69AhbnNMbzIixWQvfbpuYwPMOFXJbRq8vhn/pFPTbRJnRHMfZadBCYE6/Rl0p2X+Run xuWfBk2Zmt+6eLyfuqLyBOhKn9Pum2rUol3DBgSPfCXNfvebq0mUVn2zLl1rdmWms5Wn 4zCVlkFvYwwhheLZL6CniLFfw6v7yn/yhJ2ZCLJd5+mV82Kq8+bJ2Iu09WWoRnTp8Tvq IkBKRviSMSdB/M+SzmIYodLjC7GZyKkfoAgm7/FohYorEK9wu7KsnJ4RiTt1WG+iQfY8 vwSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bPlB/ZWaVnbXnMZZmiPIOMbk2ivK2LaUr+FEa9Yup2ivMBiEt mTkRPBzx/GyRIDbuzDjZOKyy7k2KHzDsLiueDHDRJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWoQYefeTGAUQ3FV7Srjws4aPms4JUP73DPTY+Y87Ey6NVw+RkHp2kdVWionVILEOUvztOvQ941rAhRMwLGy0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:4c6:: with SMTP id e6mr36942164lji.326.1621247172915; Mon, 17 May 2021 03:26:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210511021656.17719-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 12:26:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Enlarge IO_SPACE_LIMIT needed for some SoC To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Ansuel Smith , Matthew Wilcox , Russell King , Jonathan Corbet , Florian Fainelli , Abbott Liu , Luis Chamberlain , Palmer Dabbelt , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:26 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > I used to carry a PCIe serial port > card to UEFI plugfests because that was the only thing that would stop > working if a system configured its I/O resource window incorrectly I've been looking for a thing like that for testing, I was actually thinking that it would perhaps be a good idea to add a I/O-resource requiring device to QEMU just to be able to test this kind of thing for completeness. Yours, Linus Walleij