From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25050C433E0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 22:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27BC208E4 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 22:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="N3yiD5UX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726150AbgGaWCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:02:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35574 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725859AbgGaWCc (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:02:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D57C06174A for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id u10so8550749plr.7 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:02:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+oZo/9yW6Oqd3XkygyTtSo/s5WeOAvnnWz6QWKpx224=; b=N3yiD5UX+cR8QG4jts4p8h7nRXkfrAJtBC0xtfsVUV82LwaqCgMsXSBhUCwDJcJzbs mdahkoCEgT1sDyvHx9Y5FbWfXPDrIz13exeN+T1lkU1vAkeIA0lFp3l5iwgZjcqqHrl/ PNH02FY7/0pKPEKzsXmiuWhLaGzNca95VHWwE30dAZS3a9FPmFnWI/VZopd3K6amWRj1 vy6DazkMnzG6LR3qsz9x86pKa/WGzpTTXOjH3gs389randleAtOgHKrTf1OW8Y0DS98q YohnolyZJAxVW4w13084HdqFr+oEnqDHSWKur7Pvm8zMukTISaPPp9EyWHw330MCtEgp e9HQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+oZo/9yW6Oqd3XkygyTtSo/s5WeOAvnnWz6QWKpx224=; b=fu2CsOxx87VC7XZLe7fphEZSxlT9elcTop3d2UVwbhz4FZhJV8/GjejsP8wfjoGhFs 5YD0nP70m10SUpD4EHrPgw/RukZTBLMUIfDHMh5YuFj/U2cwXKuKAlhl7ZYScX0V8emb 1ceRlUDqP8vE8kEIquC3zBIfRXB1AajYztnsTyN9B+etF5iJo4DuXWKjZ6pYugklleLj V1IO9eytN4SPtD6ZESWxALuMlBB7E/otkEFR4GzSxMwsbqTKF0Jn9v6Yv8Hv2Nfm1A09 vCOOQNlGzbtcJoqWIG6z9r++CToDVDWm+H8JFJsx2AzLEFq+0I8Pak0heEi6Zglh1jiJ 8odg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tVAbDqmRMRSmXw2auGzHyrIROFeBd+rM0ApcfNbPCPPRNVGWT iu6q68PmtMVSNwseb5aNzgZiqCMiDhC0VUdXyuM/8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxb+RpjHPrJNGDZfqqztRJW/O3fXdm2dXBzLYFHBMbAPCDbg8ExMB3zSjKygRyZPsE3Jd6zAnVmTf8B72/3F5s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:33d1:: with SMTP id n75mr5066872pjb.217.1596232951079; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:02:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200702071416.1780522-1-davidgow@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20200702071416.1780522-1-davidgow@google.com> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:02:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: Add naming guidelines To: David Gow Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Alan Maguire , Randy Dunlap , "Theodore Ts'o" , Tim Bird , KUnit Development , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:14 AM David Gow wrote: > > As discussed in [1], KUnit tests have hitherto not had a particularly > consistent naming scheme. This adds documentation outlining how tests > and test suites should be named, including how those names should be > used in Kconfig entries and filenames. > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/202006141005.BA19A9D3@keescook/t/#u > > Signed-off-by: David Gow > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Sorry for taking so long on this; nevertheless, looks great! Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins