From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5029C433E9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B58A64E2E for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229943AbhBKNEB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:04:01 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58538 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230445AbhBKNBe (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:01:34 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C44664E2F; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:00:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1613048453; bh=R1wXfHp/mtHayjhLTRFV8J+RaQB8xzJF+ECpMM3qItM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=T87s8o56OYCjh7+2IySoSf6EQzX/8ghjZ9UEoEO8tL3PT5O/iMYBB6llgADANOEcv veO7DEsSwUQ+cciKl7+wJvOIp7q/FXfpIOgVYudhHYxDo8UX+BV0KUoN1JWCKSmoiY w5GN1sGoLrMTXKprbTvrp9IuvP4D6QUg646ZKY8w= Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:00:51 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Tudor Ambarus Cc: corbet@lwn.net, rafael@kernel.org, khilman@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, saravanak@google.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@microchip.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Mark fwnodes when their clock provider is added Message-ID: References: <20210205222644.2357303-9-saravanak@google.com> <20210210114435.122242-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> <20210210114435.122242-2-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210210114435.122242-2-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:44:35PM +0200, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > This is a follow-up for: > commit 3c9ea42802a1 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when their clock provider is added/removed") > > The above commit updated the deprecated of_clk_add_provider(), > but missed to update the preferred of_clk_add_hw_provider(). > Update it now. > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus > --- > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > index 27ff90eacb1f..9370e4dfecae 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > @@ -4594,6 +4594,8 @@ int of_clk_add_hw_provider(struct device_node *np, > if (ret < 0) > of_clk_del_provider(np); > > + fwnode_dev_initialized(&np->fwnode, true); > + > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_clk_add_hw_provider); > -- > 2.25.1 > Any objection for me taking this in my tree as well? thanks, greg k-h