[PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[Alexandre Ghiti]

If CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set, we cannot set different permissions
to the kernel data and text sections, so make sure it is defined before
trying to protect the kernel linear mapping.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 626003bb5fca..ab394d173cd4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 
 	sbi_init();
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) {
 		protect_kernel_text_data();
-
-#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
-	protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+		protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
 #endif
+	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
 	swiotlb_init(1);
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[Anup Patel]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:34 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set, we cannot set different permissions
> to the kernel data and text sections, so make sure it is defined before
> trying to protect the kernel linear mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>

Maybe you should add "Fixes:" tag in commit tag ?

Otherwise it looks good.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

Regards,
Anup

> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 626003bb5fca..ab394d173cd4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
>         sbi_init();
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) {
>                 protect_kernel_text_data();
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
> -       protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +               protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>  #endif
> +       }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>         swiotlb_init(1);
> --
> 2.20.1
>

Re: [PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[Alex Ghiti]

Hi Anup,

Le 4/16/21 à 6:41 AM, Anup Patel a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:34 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>>
>> If CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set, we cannot set different permissions
>> to the kernel data and text sections, so make sure it is defined before
>> trying to protect the kernel linear mapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
> 
> Maybe you should add "Fixes:" tag in commit tag ?

Yes you're right I should have done that. Maybe Palmer will squash it as 
it just entered for-next?

> 
> Otherwise it looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

Thank you!

Alex

> 
> Regards,
> Anup
> 
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> index 626003bb5fca..ab394d173cd4 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>
>>          sbi_init();
>>
>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) {
>>                  protect_kernel_text_data();
>> -
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
>> -       protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>> +               protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>   #endif
>> +       }
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>>          swiotlb_init(1);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> 

Re: [PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:47:19 PDT (-0700), alex@ghiti.fr wrote:
> Hi Anup,
>
> Le 4/16/21 à 6:41 AM, Anup Patel a écrit :
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:34 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> If CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set, we cannot set different permissions
>>> to the kernel data and text sections, so make sure it is defined before
>>> trying to protect the kernel linear mapping.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
>>
>> Maybe you should add "Fixes:" tag in commit tag ?
>
> Yes you're right I should have done that. Maybe Palmer will squash it as
> it just entered for-next?

Ya, I'll do it.  My testing box was just tied up last night for the rc8 
PR, so I threw this on for-next to get the buildbots to take a look.  
It's a bit too late to take something for this week, as I try to be 
pretty conservative this late in the cycle.  There's another kprobes fix 
on the list so if we end up with an rc8 I might send this along with 
that, otherwise this'll just go onto for-next before the linear map 
changes that exercise the bug.

You're more than welcome to just dig up the fixes tag and reply, my 
scripts pull all tags from replies (just like Revieweb-by).  Otherwise 
I'll do it myself, most people don't really post Fixes tags that 
accurately so I go through it for pretty much everything anyway.

Thanks for sorting this out so quickly!

>
>>
>> Otherwise it looks good.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Alex
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anup
>>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>> index 626003bb5fca..ab394d173cd4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>> @@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>>
>>>          sbi_init();
>>>
>>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
>>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) {
>>>                  protect_kernel_text_data();
>>> -
>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
>>> -       protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>> +               protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>>   #endif
>>> +       }
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>>>          swiotlb_init(1);
>>> --
>>> 2.20.1
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>>

Re: [PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[Alex Ghiti]

Le 4/16/21 à 12:33 PM, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:47:19 PDT (-0700), alex@ghiti.fr wrote:
>> Hi Anup,
>>
>> Le 4/16/21 à 6:41 AM, Anup Patel a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:34 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set, we cannot set different 
>>>> permissions
>>>> to the kernel data and text sections, so make sure it is defined before
>>>> trying to protect the kernel linear mapping.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
>>>
>>> Maybe you should add "Fixes:" tag in commit tag ?
>>
>> Yes you're right I should have done that. Maybe Palmer will squash it as
>> it just entered for-next?
> 
> Ya, I'll do it.  My testing box was just tied up last night for the rc8 
> PR, so I threw this on for-next to get the buildbots to take a look. 
> It's a bit too late to take something for this week, as I try to be 
> pretty conservative this late in the cycle.  There's another kprobes fix 
> on the list so if we end up with an rc8 I might send this along with 
> that, otherwise this'll just go onto for-next before the linear map 
> changes that exercise the bug.
> 
> You're more than welcome to just dig up the fixes tag and reply, my 
> scripts pull all tags from replies (just like Revieweb-by).  Otherwise 
> I'll do it myself, most people don't really post Fixes tags that 
> accurately so I go through it for pretty much everything anyway.

Here it is:

Fixes: 4b67f48da707 ("riscv: Move kernel mapping outside of linear mapping")

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks for sorting this out so quickly!
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Otherwise it looks good.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anup
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
>>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>> index 626003bb5fca..ab394d173cd4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>> @@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>>>
>>>>          sbi_init();
>>>>
>>>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
>>>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) {
>>>>                  protect_kernel_text_data();
>>>> -
>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
>>>> -       protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>>> +               protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>>>   #endif
>>>> +       }
>>>>
>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>>>>          swiotlb_init(1);
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-riscv mailing list
>>> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: Protect kernel linear mapping only if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is set

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:26:36 PDT (-0700), alex@ghiti.fr wrote:
> Le 4/16/21 à 12:33 PM, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:47:19 PDT (-0700), alex@ghiti.fr wrote:
>>> Hi Anup,
>>>
>>> Le 4/16/21 à 6:41 AM, Anup Patel a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:34 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set, we cannot set different
>>>>> permissions
>>>>> to the kernel data and text sections, so make sure it is defined before
>>>>> trying to protect the kernel linear mapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you should add "Fixes:" tag in commit tag ?
>>>
>>> Yes you're right I should have done that. Maybe Palmer will squash it as
>>> it just entered for-next?
>>
>> Ya, I'll do it.  My testing box was just tied up last night for the rc8
>> PR, so I threw this on for-next to get the buildbots to take a look.
>> It's a bit too late to take something for this week, as I try to be
>> pretty conservative this late in the cycle.  There's another kprobes fix
>> on the list so if we end up with an rc8 I might send this along with
>> that, otherwise this'll just go onto for-next before the linear map
>> changes that exercise the bug.
>>
>> You're more than welcome to just dig up the fixes tag and reply, my
>> scripts pull all tags from replies (just like Revieweb-by).  Otherwise
>> I'll do it myself, most people don't really post Fixes tags that
>> accurately so I go through it for pretty much everything anyway.
>
> Here it is:
>
> Fixes: 4b67f48da707 ("riscv: Move kernel mapping outside of linear mapping")

Thanks.  I just squashed it, though, as I had to rewrite this anyway.

>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks for sorting this out so quickly!
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise it looks good.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Anup
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
>>>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>>> index 626003bb5fca..ab394d173cd4 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>>>>> @@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>>>>>
>>>>>          sbi_init();
>>>>>
>>>>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
>>>>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) {
>>>>>                  protect_kernel_text_data();
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
>>>>> -       protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>>>> +               protect_kernel_linear_mapping_text_rodata();
>>>>>   #endif
>>>>> +       }
>>>>>
>>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>>>>>          swiotlb_init(1);
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-riscv mailing list
>>>> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv