From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB859C282DD for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 00:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCDA2064C for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 00:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="hJNbyZmX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727560AbgAKAUL (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:20:11 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:46151 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727454AbgAKAUL (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:20:11 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id n9so1892619pff.13 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:20:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XmDl8MlBs8zMpHbzwC/Bjnzdb8+0L6MEHqUg6wui8eM=; b=hJNbyZmXObUnnNReXzLTdAuenJ0Cs9Fy3IDYZ6wmGsmrCfWO/CaC/aROMb+knJte+7 73WWSHAFx90sYAKfkzcPgTkafMXwmE+twWaKcW+kw+tUqeTw5wGZZo53mRiIrubkGkwv iNBDPHrQ8xtgfzHUWhpdo0W622Z6parTE2pfypw8im/z2EUMs41ye2BuF5xxRSPyqyqx Pba6HoFvucvSPF8pjCuSi+eoZzeKUKRVoOwAL1TQCsbVz0IjE00F8uz7MTSOVZfwrZ1K ppvyJPKSmsbnhN1j+2nD0ZffWePtX7TJvQS3d5IMhgLe0PyI/BcSMkmkfq1wLsfz8EcV nyUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:cc:to:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XmDl8MlBs8zMpHbzwC/Bjnzdb8+0L6MEHqUg6wui8eM=; b=AJ9UrqhRb36eholYwYP7M3YJ9A18rZbXgQu1rhJkcWDLWQsckGYq+dDmz/aMDD/iEY jxtm0sUOVHy3JF0A/qzwTw5IH+36DlWXEwaEROMNKODlz9LHg5h08zRIjS8AMMWVPuVO hjafq34S7E6+T0azsHFmlnEwxlpy7sKNKhC0IxY+aSaqb4Y/G3H/a0WIqIzTGFVt6QN3 Czy3QxEmYPfdV/092lugi4rDaiuH66GJd7FX8rKWGa9xLpqFcnD+j8nmkX6jpNmMa78G O/WS6oFf8hrpeVm7jBNgH88HL+2TK2w5LGOqwRnkZ0xBO97+dgz+Nvht0+KFX2OKDAFH M89A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUMmQ2SnK3jdVZIl9EiDU3QaY9BEdElwJIUGFjo84PX/0Qu1Vu lEe37FU1uUWY0pBG7N5Mx954zy6L4mk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzjBGpO8kkPo5gF+67AjQ5pa7PPUpyL1EIgRCN2owS8u1ATduGjhglT2mSaECpWO5gFDTOwDQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8d8f:: with SMTP id i15mr7093588pfr.220.1578702010124; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:2514:7f69:cd98:a2a2:a03d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm4289190pfh.127.2020.01.10.16.20.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:20:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:20:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:58:58 PST (-0800) From: Palmer Dabbelt X-Google-Original-From: Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Typo fixes in image header and documentation. CC: Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, merker@debian.org, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org To: corbet@lwn.net In-Reply-To: <20200110101707.06800f3c@lwn.net> References: <20200110101707.06800f3c@lwn.net> <20191210072947.7018340c@lwn.net> <4912c007ab6c19321c8c988ae2328efbfb3e582d.camel@wdc.com> Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:17:07 PST (-0800), corbet@lwn.net wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:42:27 -0800 (PST) > Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > >> > I was assuming it was going through the risc-v tree since it touches arch >> > code :) I can go ahead and apply it. >> >> I don't see this in 5.5-rc5. > > It's in docs-next; I've not pushed it through straight to 5.5. I can do > that, I suppose, if it seems urgent? I just wanted to make sure it didn't get lost. The resolution of the thread was a bit ambiguous and sometimes that results me losing patches, so I just want to make sure everything is clear before I drop threads from my inbox (which is essentially my TODO list). I was just digging myself out of a big email hole so I figured anything still sitting around would have landed in Linus' tree by not, but maybe I wasn't as far behind as I thought I was :) Thanks! > > Thanks, > > jon