From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <morbidrsa@gmail.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
james.morse@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, mpc85xx: Prevent building as a module
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 20:02:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190509180220.GH17053@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190509145534.GD17053@zn.tnic>
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:55:34PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 12:52:05AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Thanks. It would be nice if you could send it as a fix for 5.2, it's the
> > last thing blocking one of my allmodconfig builds. But if you don't
> > think it qualifies as a fix that's fine too, it can wait.
>
> Sure, no problem. Will do a pull request later.
Hmm, so looking at this more, I was able to produce this config with my
ancient cross-compiler:
CONFIG_EDAC_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_EDAC=m
CONFIG_EDAC_LEGACY_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_EDAC_MPC85XX=y
Now, mpc85xx_edac is built-in and edac_core.ko is a module
(CONFIG_EDAC=m) and that should not work - i.e., builtin code calling
module functions. But my cross-compiler is happily building this without
complaint. Or maybe I'm missing something.
In any case, I *think* the proper fix should be to do:
config EDAC_MPC85XX
bool "Freescale MPC83xx / MPC85xx"
depends on FSL_SOC && EDAC=y
so that you can't even produce the above invalid .config snippet.
Hmmm?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-09 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-02 14:19 [PATCH] EDAC, mpc85xx: Prevent building as a module Michael Ellerman
2019-05-06 6:50 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-08 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 14:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-09 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:02 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-05-10 10:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-10 14:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-10 18:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-14 6:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-14 8:31 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190509180220.GH17053@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=morbidrsa@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).