From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B478C3A59D for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFEB2339F for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="jeYif56v" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732454AbfHVJ4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 05:56:00 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:53470 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732459AbfHVJ4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 05:56:00 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0DB400192DF49715E793F0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:b400:192d:f497:15e7:93f0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id A80841EC0819; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:55:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1566467758; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=8VeWpv2h+H0NzeKdjodPTrcJtIQ9N9F7wR1pWa15SXY=; b=jeYif56vB5EWS/KCP5ftkAsRS/F7tYvSGbqKAQLTkf24Pn08bv+adobZrRv/G0tQ2z1F+l oeljkyzfZPATnbp7nGwftmaTvy+M+7Gvax8qnnMi/RjMcVRxCTszv3G5GtEX+esunho7jL x586B0PC76oZE7e5fsXj4e2uNaKoN+4= Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:55:55 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Adam Borowski Cc: "Ghannam, Yazen" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] AMD64 EDAC fixes Message-ID: <20190822095554.GC11646@zn.tnic> References: <20190821235938.118710-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> <20190822005020.GA403@angband.pl> <20190822083548.GA11646@zn.tnic> <20190822094607.GA14667@angband.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190822094607.GA14667@angband.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Yeah, some of messages are no longer emitted for memory-less nodes (NUMA 1 > and 3). Your patch set also overhauls the messages. Not my patchset - Yazen's. > But, the amount of redundant messages I'm complaining about has actually > increased: He's working on that - that still needs some love. Thanks for testing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.