From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65D5C49ED7 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 22:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840F4208C2 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 22:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390376AbfIMWNq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:13:46 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:24050 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390143AbfIMWNq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:13:46 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2019 15:13:45 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,489,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="337033392" Received: from agluck-desk2.sc.intel.com ([10.3.52.68]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2019 15:13:45 -0700 From: Tony Luck To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Tony Luck , Qiuxu Zhuo , Aristeu Rozanski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] EDAC, skx: Provide more machine specific location detail Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:13:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20190913221344.13055-1-tony.luck@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org First patch refactors code so that second can work on systems with and without the ACPI ADXL address translation code. Perhaps has some value on its own as the code is, IMHO, a little cleaner. Second is in RFC state. Im looking for input on whether to just print the extra information to the console log (as the patch does now) or whether to tag it onto the long string that we push though the EDAC reporting path. Tony Luck (2): EDAC, skx_common: Refactor so that we initialize "dev" in result of adxl decode. EDAC, skx: Retrieve and print retry_rd_err_log registers drivers/edac/skx_base.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/edac/skx_common.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/edac/skx_common.h | 4 ++- 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1