From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BE8C17460 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6870E21928 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="XpBpELIO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389024AbfKENsZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:48:25 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45196 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388860AbfKENsY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:48:24 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0EF00014F02C62D0694FB9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:f000:14f0:2c62:d069:4fb9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 982891EC0CBB; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:48:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1572961699; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=6mm00xcBJWVDWWyU6tXbjrS8ETDOe/B1Q8WPOB6PDus=; b=XpBpELIOW3nc5f85I3u07i1lkm4oAHq4663nqqHeNJcBrlx58SixkIYyasL6TrhjWFhdLv 8OAUi0fvOF8IZFGrz7Oq4XEgOZ7V5h+cFIKOQJRW0ZYVnVTVS+TM6ecKqQv6UDegQwMlwO AgzFBn6gkkx/MjCS/Y4Goi+P0LgBy/c= Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:48:12 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Ghannam, Yazen" Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] AMD64 EDAC: Check for nodes without memory, etc. Message-ID: <20191105134812.GA32614@zn.tnic> References: <20191022203448.13962-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> <20191025133456.GA6483@zn.tnic> <20191101155412.GA2300@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:38:15PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > Do you have any other comments on this set? No, it looks good otherwise. > Should I send another revision with this change? Pls do, thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette