linux-edac.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] EDAC, ghes: Fix locking and memory barrier issues
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:11:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191105201115.v2pe6k6g2brx5itv@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105200732.3053-1-rrichter@marvell.com>

On 05.11.19 20:07:51, Robert Richter wrote:
> The ghes registration and refcount is broken in several ways:
> 
>  * ghes_edac_register() returns with success for a 2nd instance even
>    if a first instance is still running. This is not correct as the
>    first instance may fail later. A subsequent registration may not
>    finish before the first. Parallel registrations must be avoided.
> 
>  * The refcount was increased even if a registration failed. This
>    leads to stale counters preventing the device from being released.
> 
>  * The ghes refcount may not be decremented properly on
>    unregistration. Always decrement the refcount once
>    ghes_edac_unregister() is called to keep the refcount sane.
> 
>  * The ghes_pvt pointer is handed to the irq handler before
>    registration finished.
> 
>  * The mci structure could be freed while the irq handler is running.
> 
> Fix this by adding a mutex to ghes_edac_register(). This mutex
> serializes instances to register and unregister. The refcount is only
> increased if the registration succeeded. This makes sure the refcount
> is in a consistent state after registering or unregistering a device.
> Note: A spinlock cannot be used here as the code section may sleep.
> 
> The ghes_pvt is protected by ghes_lock now. This ensures the pointer
> is not updated before registration was finished or while the irq
> handler is running. It is unset before unregistering the device
> including necessary (implicit) memory barriers making the changes
> visible to other cpus. Thus, the device can not be used anymore by an
> interrupt.
> 
> Also, rename ghes_init to ghes_refcount for better readability and
> switch to refcount API.
> 
> A refcount is needed. There can be multiple GHES structures being
> defined (see ACPI 6.3 specification, 18.3.2.7 Generic Hardware Error
> Source, "Some platforms may describe multiple Generic Hardware Error
> Source structures with different notification types, ...").
> 
> Another approach to use the mci's device refcount (get_device()) and
> have a release function does not work here. A release function will be
> called only for device_release() with the last put_device() call. The
> device must be deleted *before* that with device_del(). This is only
> possible by maintaining an own refcount.
> 
> Fixes: 0fe5f281f749 ("EDAC, ghes: Model a single, logical memory controller")
> Fixes: 1e72e673b9d1 ("EDAC/ghes: Fix Use after free in ghes_edac remove path")
> Co-developed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>

I hope this SOB chain is correct now.

Thanks,

-Robert

> ---
> V3:
>  * fixed SOB chain again (added SOBs according to
>    submitting-patches.rst)
> 
> V2:
>  * fixed missing 'goto unlock' in error path
>  * fixed SOB chain
>  * added comment on how to protect ghes_pvt with ghes_lock
>  * renamed ghes_init to ghes_refcount
>  * switched to refcount API instead of atomic_*
> ---
>  drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05 20:07 [PATCH v3] EDAC, ghes: Fix locking and memory barrier issues Robert Richter
2019-11-05 20:11 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2019-11-08 15:32   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191105201115.v2pe6k6g2brx5itv@rric.localdomain \
    --to=rrichter@marvell.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).