From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4308C33C8C for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD17208C4 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="qwSxTPDn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728262AbgAGQpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:45:38 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:56160 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728020AbgAGQpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:45:38 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0FB400396D31B560FFF95B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:b400:396d:31b5:60ff:f95b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id B4D961EC0CDB; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 17:45:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1578415536; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=jufPnKecMHTAkKEECZqo+A1p5PoTP4eEup3vWRrA1es=; b=qwSxTPDnjdCW+h0iv6RHxfILKoLbzhc0BB31oSiOYInRNbKrNg+qmDpVWCnNrcqYg1hlDs E5n90AmBbypxc52nBlcXVE/Wp9EggnwJSGE9NwdrK9FKN9+mpT35FiQquIhGeiA1KWU+X+ i5W62+FlSInbz34i/COo58IgVKdq2ic= Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 17:45:28 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: 'Aristeu Rozanski' Cc: "Luck, Tony" , "'linux-edac@vger.kernel.org'" , 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: skx_common: downgrade message importance on missing PCI device Message-ID: <20200107164528.GD29542@zn.tnic> References: <20191204212325.c4k47p5hrnn3vpb5@redhat.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F4F13AB@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F4F19BD@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com> <20191210090013.GA9395@zn.tnic> <20200106151242.vkdiiwhubmkx5osh@redhat.com> <20200106161732.GF12238@zn.tnic> <20200106162013.cbbeo4ezdp2h7p62@redhat.com> <20200106162306.GG12238@zn.tnic> <20200107155109.6gphrtqb2a7q4unn@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200107155109.6gphrtqb2a7q4unn@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 10:51:09AM -0500, 'Aristeu Rozanski' wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:23:06PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > I'm not saying you should blindly remove them. They might be useful for > > debugging purposes so you should consider that usage angle first. In the > > AMD case, the message was really useless. > > Ah, I thought you had an objection to this patch :) > Do you mind considering it for inclusion? That's Tony's call as he's maintaining the Intel side of EDAC. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette