linux-edac.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Manali K Shukla <manashuk@cisco.com>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xe-linux-external@cisco.com,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Aristeu Rozanski Filho <arozansk@redhat.com>,
	Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@hpe.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ PATCH stable v4.19] EDAC: Drop per-memory controller buses
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:22:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317102249.GC1130294@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312052201.49456-1-manashuk@cisco.com>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:22:01PM -0700, Manali K Shukla wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 
> upstream 861e6ed667c83d64a42b0db41a22d6b4de4e913f commit
> 
> ... and use the single edac_subsys object returned from
> subsys_system_register(). The idea is to have a single bus
> and multiple devices on it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
> CC: Aristeu Rozanski Filho <arozansk@redhat.com>
> CC: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> CC: Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@hpe.com>
> CC: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
> CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> CC: Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180926152752.GG5584@zn.tnic
> [Manali: backport to v4.19 -stable :
> - removing per-MC bus, this enables to get rid of memory controllers
>   maximum number notion
> - value of max number of memory controllers is 2 * MAX_NUMNODES. On two nodes system MAX_NUMNODES value is ‘1’ and
>   so value of max number of memory controller becomes ‘2’, this patch fixes this issue when there are only 2 nodes on the system
>   and number of memory controllers are more than ‘2’]
> (cherry picked from commit 861e6ed667c83d64a42b0db41a22d6b4de4e913f)
> Signed-off-by: Manali K Shukla <manashuk@cisco.com>

Why is this a patch for the stable trees?  What problem does it solve?

thanks,

greg k-h-

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-17 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-12  5:22 [ PATCH stable v4.19] EDAC: Drop per-memory controller buses Manali K Shukla
2020-03-17 10:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-04-05 18:01   ` Manali Shukla (manashuk)
2020-04-05 18:06     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-05 19:26       ` Manali Shukla (manashuk)
2020-06-16 10:37         ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200317102249.GC1130294@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=justin.ernst@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manashuk@cisco.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=rja@hpe.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xe-linux-external@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).