From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3314CC433E3 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE8D2078B for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="JLyHtJuM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729923AbgHQSxr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:53:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37524 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387814AbgHQSxo (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:53:44 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5D0C061389; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f26be00329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f26:be00:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 594151EC026E; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:53:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1597690421; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=R9rpQQ3QHK65dGeiLDAY9hsv8ikqXlZFeTV49qjDFhs=; b=JLyHtJuMAboC+cV46FCxtaqv6/HVYof2SrVxT377a4nEjVxBhWTBBZjvB2FWruvZeCoftT oxmab1CVK7Y+XDzb2G9AU00CkuADnq9K0D8MoBmdemyZFos51X34b5zQcoYRY1jtNV0Gnn wuCneV/LpbFQyLhQPohnFbuIoPkCjPA= Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:54:36 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Sami Tolvanen Cc: Luca Stefani , Tony Luck , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RAS/CEC: Fix cec_init prototype Message-ID: <20200817185436.GO549@zn.tnic> References: <20200805045955.GB9127@nazgul.tnic> <20200805095708.83939-1-luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com> <20200812210909.GA3283093@google.com> <20200817151357.GK549@zn.tnic> <20200817174102.GN549@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:11:02AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > Not the toolchain, the tree has patches for LTO+CFI, which tends to > break with type mismatches. This doesn't affect just building the > kernel with Clang without other changes. Ok, that explains it. As for why I'm still chasing down the exact reason for the reported breakage: this will determine the urgency with which this fix is handled and to which trees it needs to go so please be more precise next time when saying "it broke". :) Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette