From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813D7C433E2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0820921974 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="dkjNDHkv" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727817AbgIORVR (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:21:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60872 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727801AbgIORTo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:19:44 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D28C061788; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0e42006096e946d741c4e4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:4200:6096:e946:d741:c4e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 93F7E1EC0268; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:19:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1600190356; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=ZP2LnXhKjOXrRyQf7jvLKq0NuLElbgCFkZmlLt3hIl8=; b=dkjNDHkvejyobN7hl6Fbb6TNQhow+DwpebQ9stMbawfCCn+vDB65JFPbMvvpz/3xftJDWX SX1as4kLkUCyDsheJgQixzT4v51TIClE1lv9pjVBPU7PIXYtzG58qmOPPM/138bBRp2LOk 6LH9up5nWYwNWfTVsbbwKX+ol9mqt4g= Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:19:10 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Alex Kluver , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , mchehab@kernel.org, russ.anderson@hpe.com, Dimitri Sivanich , kluveralex@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] edac,ghes,cper: Add Row Extension to Memory Error Record Message-ID: <20200915171910.GQ14436@zn.tnic> References: <20200819143544.155096-1-alex.kluver@hpe.com> <20200819143544.155096-2-alex.kluver@hpe.com> <20200915163312.GO14436@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:12:31PM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Boris - do you anticipate any conflicts? If so, please take these via > the EDAC tree - the CPER code is mostly self contained so I don't > expect any conflicts with the EFI tree in that case. None so far, and I applied them for testing ontop of my EDAC queue for 5.10 so it should be all good. But if you want me, I can test-merge your branch once ready, just in case... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette