From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E153CC4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F2622263 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="hkjV8i72" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1773221AbgJZLLx (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:11:53 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:35692 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1773194AbgJZLLh (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:11:37 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f07cc003725ac6034898aff.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f07:cc00:3725:ac60:3489:8aff]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 604D11EC0299; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:11:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1603710694; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=h6H9IyipOfafFZkUPerdfTU6T6boaJdO4lhf1zJq2SI=; b=hkjV8i72yVGZgawKyvtovQkU7hR2/BUf+rBJ4HClnaQDc73zcUfZjL312tx/eFHpsFBj8j bVa2kz0PEZX8HIqu2knHsNUcU2rnyQ4wnqGs76SLFLlHxWYijZ2W9Rc0sdy6AVQL+BUIAT vhownORCnh6wA7nrF236XqtfbRaHMXU= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:11:25 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: trix@redhat.com Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com, rric@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: amd64_edac: remove unneeded break Message-ID: <20201026111125.GB22116@zn.tnic> References: <20201019193524.13391-1-trix@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201019193524.13391-1-trix@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:35:24PM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix > > A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix > --- > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 8 -------- > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette