From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47500C4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28F720829 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="gnPPcJoH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1783391AbgJZSKz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:10:55 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:46982 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1783079AbgJZSKz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:10:55 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f07cc0024b0561f65548092.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f07:cc00:24b0:561f:6554:8092]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id F2D841EC0269; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:10:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1603735854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=MrpTYkhMFnyRsetekU5rFpB3Oi6D2d6P62h7TZCpwKI=; b=gnPPcJoHSx4f+rKRsAl2pWOc722qGTspiblobyCpc8y7tVXrwtafVpVGCUMhQBlt2pNo2Q 0f6/0be3rTu++NoIjASTYxr3Jn858t09UQj7P8g2m7hV9YB8vqR1LExeEgtrcVYMP2eNeN ez9P3fJ76FYAOFXqHOXfArviJKXha7M= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:10:43 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jason Baron Cc: Raymond Bennett , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Jim Cromie Subject: Re: Constant output in syslog of EDAC message Message-ID: <20201026181043.GF22116@zn.tnic> References: <20201019205658.GI24325@zn.tnic> <20201020091940.GA11583@zn.tnic> <3d0f6dfa-850c-a4e1-c9fa-4b4ca1983650@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3d0f6dfa-850c-a4e1-c9fa-4b4ca1983650@akamai.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:47:05PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > So, we would still continue to support edac_debug_level=N but the > user would have additional control. Do you have any actual users needing this? If yes, what are their use cases? Because I have this aversion towards adding functionality just because and that it potentially might be useful and "users may want". Either they do and they want to use it for X or we don't do anything... yet. In this particular example, those debug printks are just useless noise so off they go. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette