From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01C9C433E6 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8949A64EC9 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234880AbhBXJ6C (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:58:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kingsoft.com ([114.255.44.146]:45292 "EHLO mail.kingsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234829AbhBXJ52 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:57:28 -0500 X-AuditID: 0a580157-f39ff7000005df43-0a-60361c8fe966 Received: from mail.kingsoft.com (localhost [10.88.1.32]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.kingsoft.com (SMG-1-NODE-87) with SMTP id 4F.E4.57155.F8C16306; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:29:51 +0800 (HKT) Received: from alex-virtual-machine (172.16.253.254) by KSBJMAIL2.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:56:33 +0800 Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:56:32 +0800 From: Aili Yao To: "Luck, Tony" CC: Borislav Petkov , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "yangfeng1@kingsoft.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Dump cper error table in mce_panic Message-ID: <20210224175632.5d99abcc@alex-virtual-machine> In-Reply-To: <434eba7a568a4b9f8eb7ee11a5c8b04f@intel.com> References: <20201104065057.40442-1-yaoaili126@163.com> <20201117175804.39bbbdc3.yaoaili@kingsoft.com> <20201118124538.GI7472@zn.tnic> <20201119134057.37ca2c19.yaoaili@kingsoft.com> <20201119174508.GE3769@zn.tnic> <20201120172235.620eb826.yaoaili@kingsoft.com> <20201120102422.GA712@zn.tnic> <20210128200128.6f022993.yaoaili@kingsoft.com> <20210223171809.7df62b08@alex-virtual-machine> <434eba7a568a4b9f8eb7ee11a5c8b04f@intel.com> Organization: kingsoft X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.16.253.254] X-ClientProxiedBy: KSBJMAIL1.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.31) To KSBJMAIL2.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.32) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFcGooNsvY5Zg8GGfssXnDf/YLO7vW85k sfPhWzaL5fv6GS0unGpgsjhz+hKrxZsL91gc2D2+t/axeKyZt4bRY/Gel0wem1Z1snlsudrO 4vF5k1wAWxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXRsuLb6wF89grnh2YxNrAeJi1i5GDQ0LARGLNG6EuRi4O IYHpTBITryxjhHBeMUpcm3SLvYuRk4NFQFWi4+U2VhCbDcjedW8WmC0ioCZxafEDZpAGZoEL TBLLZv5lAUkIC1hJPN3wBszmBbIvNu4DG8QpYCnx+Ow3dogN75klFp1YBZbgFxCT6L3ynwnE lhCwl2jbsogRollQ4uTMJ2CDmAV0JE6sOsYMYctLbH87B8wWElCUOLzkFztEr5LEke4ZbBB2 rMSyea9YJzAKz0IyahaSUbOQjFrAyLyKkaU4N91wEyMkMsJ3MM5r+qh3iJGJg/EQowQHs5II 7+Z/pglCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTEeQO3mSQICaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUamBYU Fex9+9nXeqVu8zblyJqXjZN/1h1f4iV8cdrfHVf1tni53mFZdYrTd+6k2DDvNx/DTm3b/9xj 6qeFS3mDv1T22k++s+OExZs6F60krQ0iVe8WXG6761VvfJ1L7fbfCaIfxbYWOZ9YZ7xBzPb4 3HcrTuYtmx5Uu5s9pWvdL+FUlYhzKze9t4qp3jy3bN1WS5lva7VyLf27uatqyhufnZZTS8hO 0PXmmPOm76P2JaUpNdw/Tm162XY3P5br1Ic5E0UWNDM/3RlfYLTH/Bs/+8bTWo3/7bZscFi8 xsSoqP7ZxlWuj/+LGixWmXj9wvrkyiopOYemgkmTFr7jXTeLS/Zg2Yown99zdAtPsZqxF6Qq sRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAaRl+D/sCAAA= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:32:37 +0000 "Luck, Tony" wrote: > > I am not smart enough to get the point. I have paid a lot of time for this patch, > > I need an result even it doesn't work. so i like the reply like this: > > > > 1. this patch is meaningless, and should be rejected. > > 2. this issue is real, but we need other methond, not this patch. > > 3. the patch need to improve. > > I don't want to say that the patch is meaningless ... it may be useful to you > in your environment to help sort out machine checks due to h/w issues vs. > programming errors in the machine check recovery code. > > But I don't think it is generally useful in the upstream code. Got it. Another thing I want to say is that when mca_cfg.tolerant is set to 3, this NMI handling will also panic the system in some case, but it seems there is not a big influence though. Thanks Aili Yao