From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A6DC433B4 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EC5611CB for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 23:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230135AbhEEXCx (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 19:02:53 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:53618 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229821AbhEEXCw (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 19:02:52 -0400 Received: from sequoia (162-237-133-238.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [162.237.133.238]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C53C20B7178; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:01:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 8C53C20B7178 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1620255715; bh=2G61eTtWodmZSE5qpbSyTo8m3sCaUsW/XU9eK3gDywc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hyFJD2G79yPYAoGto1/xWyojG4YLWqGRsiqJ1Cd9U3sJsJ8lVbpX50a76uJMtvWwt qy4wWHsqcABGR9vcg1Hfn1hQdldtHJRwBU7O5c63vjgLAmNLyh4D8+bYji1hdRXSOv Iyv8l5shmCjpdtyQh+o5iFf2MtV1nOPCFUfwwNQI= Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:01:52 -0500 From: Tyler Hicks To: Borislav Petkov Cc: wangglei , "Lei Wang (DPLAT)" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "rric@kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hang Li , Brandon Waller Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] EDAC: update edac printk wrappers to use printk_ratelimited. Message-ID: <20210505230152.GH4967@sequoia> References: <20210505202357.GC4967@sequoia> <20210505214846.GE4967@sequoia> <20210505221605.GF4967@sequoia> <20210505224357.GG4967@sequoia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On 2021-05-06 00:55:00, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 05:43:57PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > This is x86-specific > > That's because it is used by x86 currently. It shouldn't be hard to use > it on another arch though as the machinery is pretty generic. > > > and not applicable in our situation. > > What is your situation? ARM? Yes, though I'm not sure if those additional features are important/useful enough for us to generalize that driver. The main motivation here was just to prevent storage/network from being flooded by obviously-bad nodes that haven't been offlined yet. :) Lei and others on cc will need to evaluate porting cec.c and what it will gain them. Thanks again. Tyler > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette >