From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EDAC: Armada XP: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() in two functions
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:25:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65836b6f-9133-4a14-466d-865830f5bfc0@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923081117.4p4mwqz35fzavkeg@rric.localdomain>
> Which semantic patch did you use here?
I suggest to take another look at details around background information
on a subject like “Coccinelle: api: add devm_platform_ioremap_resource script”.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/2cacd712-a8b8-6471-a9b4-23ba54434c02@web.de/
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-September/006303.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/81
> There are probably more drivers to fix than the above and the one you fixed:
Yes, of course.
I concentrated my update suggestions on a specific source code
transformation variant recently.
> So while at it, how about fixing the .cocci patch in scripts/ and run
> it for drivers/edac?
Some developers are trying to improve affected software components further.
Did you eventually receive similar patches already by other contributors?
> There should be one patch only for all edac drivers.
Is there consensus for this kind of change expectation?
Regards,
Markus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-23 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-21 15:57 [PATCH] EDAC: Armada XP: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() in two functions Markus Elfring
2019-09-23 8:11 ` Robert Richter
2019-09-23 9:25 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65836b6f-9133-4a14-466d-865830f5bfc0@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).