From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"Huangming (Mark)" <huangming23@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: linuxnext-20191127 edac warns (was Re: edac KASAN warning in experimental arm64 allmodconfig boot)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 11:02:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7131f2b9-d4c3-b858-2d17-c56003789df2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127205400.cip7hdbhcdokofel@rric.localdomain>
Hi Robert,
> thank you for testing.
I'm just stumbling across these, TBH.
>
> On 27.11.19 17:07:33, John Garry wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> I have test enabled:
>> +CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y
>> +CONFIG_KASAN=y
>> +CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
>
> Is this a regression (did it work before?), or a new test that you
> newly run?
linuxnext-20191119 does not look to have the issue - that's when I
cherry-pick your refcount fix - but has lots of memory leaks:
root@(none)$
root@(none)$ echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
root@(none)$ [ 121.639978] kmemleak: 128 new suspected memory leaks
(see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
root@(none)$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff00236c24ba00 (size 256):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294897826 (age 107.824s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 40 2d 3c 23 00 ff ff 00 48 2d 3c 23 00 ff ff .@-<#....H-<#...
00 50 2d 3c 23 00 ff ff 00 58 2d 3c 23 00 ff ff .P-<#....X-<#...
backtrace:
[<0000000009aed8e3>] __kmalloc+0x1e0/0x2c0
[<00000000bf599427>] edac_mc_alloc+0x31c/0x888
[<00000000c070e314>] ghes_edac_register+0x15c/0x390
[<00000000e4aad1c2>] ghes_probe+0x28c/0x5f0
[<0000000079c357cb>] platform_drv_probe+0x70/0xd8
[<00000000d4ab9188>] really_probe+0x118/0x548
[<00000000763d50f1>] driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x148
[<0000000058e623c3>] device_driver_attach+0x94/0xa0
[<00000000d7cb679d>] __driver_attach+0xa4/0x110
[<000000007d0942a0>] bus_for_each_dev+0xe8/0x158
[<000000004cf734d1>] driver_attach+0x30/0x40
[<000000009aa3536e>] bus_add_driver+0x234/0x2f0
[<00000000d163cfe0>] driver_register+0xbc/0x1d0
[<000000007e4f0ac1>] __platform_driver_register+0x7c/0x88
[<00000000a63c8dd0>] ghes_init+0xbc/0x14c
[<00000000356c8a7f>] do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x254
unreferenced object 0xffff00233c2d4000 (size 1024):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294897826 (age 107.824s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000004945469f>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x188/0x260
[<0000000032ea779d>] edac_mc_alloc+0x38c/0x888
Unfortunately v5.4 has similar memory leaks.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-28 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 15:18 edac KASAN warning in experimental arm64 allmodconfig boot John Garry
2019-10-14 16:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-14 16:44 ` John Garry
2019-10-14 16:15 ` James Morse
2019-10-14 16:56 ` John Garry
2019-10-14 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-21 12:34 ` linuxnext-2019119 edac warns (was Re: edac KASAN warning in experimental arm64 allmodconfig boot) John Garry
2019-11-21 14:23 ` Robert Richter
2019-11-21 15:23 ` John Garry
2019-11-21 21:36 ` [PATCH] EDAC/ghes: Do not warn when incrementing refcount on 0 Robert Richter
2019-11-22 9:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-26 9:57 ` John Garry
2019-11-22 11:28 ` linuxnext-2019119 edac warns (was Re: edac KASAN warning in experimental arm64 allmodconfig boot) Robert Richter
2019-11-26 9:59 ` John Garry
2019-11-27 17:07 ` linuxnext-2019127 " John Garry
2019-11-27 20:54 ` Robert Richter
2019-11-28 11:02 ` John Garry [this message]
2019-11-28 16:44 ` linuxnext-20191127 " Borislav Petkov
2019-11-28 21:12 ` linuxnext-2019127 " Robert Richter
2019-12-02 10:23 ` John Garry
2019-12-02 11:46 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7131f2b9-d4c3-b858-2d17-c56003789df2@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=huangming23@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).