From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1411C0650F for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDB4217F4 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732297AbfHHPI7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:08:59 -0400 Received: from outbound.smtp.vt.edu ([198.82.183.121]:41000 "EHLO omr1.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728327AbfHHPI7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:08:59 -0400 Received: from mr4.cc.vt.edu (mail.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:9:0:9d:8fcb:4116]) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x78F8vmH030140 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:08:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by mr4.cc.vt.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x78F8qvp026245 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:08:57 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id j81so82432494qke.23 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=sZG45UfQMhTHDUgEHKrzSwCRO/ejJ3aFWUQpSgQlypU=; b=XVJy1qnO71xBtZ2GFAfVFXRNY29TPAWnl39WCcQfVOei5w/W5MqIw5r/PJ4nsP8soQ AIEBIygCrHjznusJQh6gmaxpW6/CjluHWJWNfXiHTxfqeAa+wE185qdFJjEsJvZpdZ15 L6h00njZxQWCwyppPMShbs9mWexYzX+9MiS1DC0AZYjqiTOUcq+Hj0BcloYk8lAhOo7R xGCupjUSSykGjxPBrYOMpykLiHvEcYh+rZ9vr0aOzV2KVVuR/m7BOV39hQzb3wk3pnSd rxHIqk9+CdtQFlOFyYhVl/UYHBjoD+DBfS1HbKUEu+47wquWsP0be4bkgYVkcimyYsv5 LVrg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCvwz/V4luijK4fEvtzDLJs6utZ2d1ing6TPEW+3IjdJdvfRQe GmjuWXvx1EvvlyHFPY70l/AJsrxkfKNLNdVR5c7bbJrEJaTCOyI/N4LNa30gWZjSJj+fBD2KfzQ VDw17/SqGuIWA9r0131L1s8CvWUYGcV7B X-Received: by 2002:ae9:eb08:: with SMTP id b8mr9196295qkg.481.1565276932460; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:08:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyA4TmeX8wFs2niCTUr8jpeybcDjuWJjkUN+7g+sMgPRJHkHu8c64Y0d9aeO1jbLAwwx41VNg== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:eb08:: with SMTP id b8mr9196266qkg.481.1565276932155; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from turing-police ([2601:5c0:c001:4341::359]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm43822769qke.47.2019.08.08.08.08.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:08:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Google-Original-From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Tony Luck , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers/ras: Don't build debugfs.o if no debugfs in config In-Reply-To: <20190808142055.GF20745@zn.tnic> References: <7053.1565218556@turing-police> <20190808093101.GE20745@zn.tnic> <77171.1565269299@turing-police> <20190808142055.GF20745@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1565276929_4269P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:08:49 -0400 Message-ID: <84877.1565276929@turing-police> Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1565276929_4269P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:20:55 +0200, Borislav Petkov said: > config RAS_CEC > depends on X86_MCE && MEMORY_FAILURE && DEBUG_FS > ^^^^^^^^ I'm willing to respin that patch that way instead - if cec.c is basically pointless without debugfs, that's probably a good solution. My first read of the code was that the debugfs support was "additional optional" code, not "this is pointless without it" code. --==_Exmh_1565276929_4269P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 iQIVAwUBXUw7AQdmEQWDXROgAQKNRg/+KNGYFpbwNYNSUS145bUcs6vMvWaQtaao qWy9xgA3sFeykg6JDreq0viGTyIL/Sr3GHn2XR2Y96d58bOWZZs4o+uDfbjIEdO4 lQ6qZPOo0gPKMYv04xTyyG8XTFXBCN/JgUQP5zGEapXVasd+IdmDJI3/ITfjx+TF +k15Ytf0sUGvR/RXaFnautbmcWkSlhKwkCluoo1+6S2As0IgalBCD4R2dx/1W1By wclZ+M2f+b4HS3qZC7u/VmLBy7pU6CFJ4aU3zCoc/bKc5lfRWf7xkNwG7DMUVnOV QLtDPa9bdMGX7s3HgTf1h4qXM81i6Gy6stjRoyE1CEI5VKO3EnyIycaje5xknEF7 OAOxqKjgEYi06xlBoWjmMxjVfFUd+nqY61S0PoHPscvmWVJ6p8JkUb4G27tXK21l QxExAtX2f8YEYsv0Zjrrq0upXjHcOoiaVuVl9gv6bDaUZgfQ60/hT/78JNSVOv+g IRlq4egBQaeF2TrIuAwEoPWlnG6kOfLKuI1hIduKuHVKIcxNk6dmtPt5wO740O98 8uF9nMivwqBwICkSPWPhAIOdCwSMh4HjhHkNd5xrQ5ZB8+woLy9nW76EdTFk2LUv vd9APOV9WNy6BmasFL3ojgYp1nz3tHTcfUQ6ADA/4so69dx7NPAa5FW4JoFTc2x0 Is22wr5pjoQ= =ntaN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1565276929_4269P--