From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:24:54 +0200 Message-ID: <CAHp75VeeKZLeZ8E3Py7LECN54SPFHaRgkxrMzBYQWXM8x+4JhA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200324060124.GC11705@shao2-debian> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit: > commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros") > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729 > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next > > in testcase: will-it-scale > on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory > with following parameters: drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator, perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and reordering lines may affect this. Can you restore terminator there and re-test? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:31 ` [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Andy Shevchenko [not found] ` <20200320131508.736205164@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:33 ` [patch 01/22] x86/devicetable: Move x86 specific macro out of generic code Andy Shevchenko 2020-03-20 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [not found] ` <20200320131508.826011988@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:29 ` [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros Bjorn Helgaas 2020-03-20 14:39 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-03-20 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner [not found] ` <20200320131509.467730627@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:47 ` [patch 08/22] ACPI: Convert to new X86 " Andy Shevchenko 2020-03-20 20:32 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-03-23 16:38 ` mark gross [not found] ` <20200320131509.766573641@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:52 ` [patch 11/22] platform/x86: Convert to new " Andy Shevchenko [not found] ` <20200320131510.594671507@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:58 ` [patch 19/22] ASoC: Intel: Convert to new X86 " Andy Shevchenko 2020-03-20 14:59 ` [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Greg Kroah-Hartman [not found] ` <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> 2020-03-20 14:50 ` [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Andy Shevchenko 2020-03-20 20:30 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-03-20 21:52 ` Andy Shevchenko 2020-03-20 22:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [not found] ` <20200324060124.GC11705@shao2-debian> 2020-03-24 10:24 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message] 2020-03-24 15:38 ` [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression Srinivas Pandruvada 2020-03-25 7:51 ` Rong Chen 2020-03-25 7:50 ` Rong Chen 2020-03-25 10:32 ` Thomas Gleixner 2020-03-26 8:33 ` kernel test robot 2020-03-24 13:51 ` [patch V2 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner 2020-03-24 15:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2020-03-24 18:58 ` [PATCH 23/22] x86/smpboot: Remove the last ICPU() macro Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20200320131509.673579000@linutronix.de> 2020-03-24 19:31 ` [patch 10/22] EDAC: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Luck, Tony
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAHp75VeeKZLeZ8E3Py7LECN54SPFHaRgkxrMzBYQWXM8x+4JhA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \ --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \ --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \ --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \ --cc=andy@infradead.org \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \ --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \ --cc=lenb@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \ --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \ --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \ --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tiwai@suse.com \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \ --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-EDAC Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/0 linux-edac/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-edac linux-edac/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac \ linux-edac@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-edac Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-edac AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git