From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114E8C4363D for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BB1206D9 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:52:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600872751; bh=BuNEmV3RbwiVDXoElwTtCudTourRjlDPhW6anCvkcOI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=OKYypR0akuuLJm2ocsjXzFOsb8JykE34RuUawE9T/gmgGBduiSG0tXxTv+LpEZBKI BOq1Amh2R5NLhzPkou8r2VFsUnLx+Ajw3gG+ULOTZX8p0fMBapJDQfGAilHZDXP/Ma aqkGq37XwE1WCnprQc5804hhKoDoGG8mk20flN48= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726738AbgIWOwb (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:52:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47592 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726553AbgIWOwb (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:52:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75E7C21D43; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:52:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600872750; bh=BuNEmV3RbwiVDXoElwTtCudTourRjlDPhW6anCvkcOI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=omls3z2aNzSeO7YXJU8B+XpmHWyF7nGvgmS7/nl0TsXghchmwrQSj6W/Fr3D5YEEA J7QcVSmwme+9NAIeJhS1gJ0GcDpRBpSLJ1SPedz5eghiQ4uCcTSt/OrjAVrb1FR3eB lhPYORoRYhhHGaxA1Uc1//fJY0ro08uk0kL2Zw+s= Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id u25so19229375otq.6; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:52:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qvSuuWokCOVRdtUsJQZxJwEgbw6r7UtI/FW+vDTftHV5mrjEW mZmbVbvOzcVExMZ9B9WC4p8GhV/X2HjptSPc744= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1tB0v4rYXWKiVzq4CO7HqLAQuT148DttuOsfIeDd/8T6HdfGV6yNZdU27bv3drjcxGrhH7zes5DzzT22HS3U= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6193:: with SMTP id g19mr43512otk.108.1600872749842; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:52:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200904140444.161291-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> <87wo0kiz6y.fsf@kokedama.swc.toshiba.co.jp> <20200923140512.GJ28545@zn.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20200923140512.GJ28545@zn.tnic> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:52:18 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cper, apei, mce: Pass x86 CPER through the MCA handling chain To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Punit Agrawal , Smita Koralahalli , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi , ACPI Devel Maling List , devel@acpica.org, Tony Luck , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Yazen Ghannam Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 16:05, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Smita, > > pls sync the time of the box where you create the patch: > > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:04:44 -0500 > > but your mail headers have: > > Received: from ... with mapi id 15.20.3370.019; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:49:12 +0000 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 07:07:17PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: > > I know Boris asked you to add the reason for the Reported-by, but > > usually we don't track version differences in the committed patch. > > > > Boris, can you confirm if you want the Reported-by to be retained? > > How else would you explain what the Reported-by: tag is for on a patch > which adds a feature? > I think the question is why we are retaining this Reported-by header to begin with. Even though the early feedback is appreciated, crediting the bot for eternity for a version of the patch that never got merged seems a bit excessive. Also, it may suggest that the bot was involved in reporting an issue that the patch aims to fix but that is not the case. The last thing we want is Sasha's bot to jump on patches adding new functionality just because it has a reported-by line. So I suggest dropping the Reported-by credit as well as the [] context regarding v1