From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E417C4707F for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F8160FE4 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232367AbhEYSET (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 14:04:19 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:40006 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232541AbhEYSEQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 14:04:16 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0c1b000aca3c1b1089f8dd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:1b00:aca:3c1b:1089:f8dd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 73B421EC0249; Tue, 25 May 2021 20:02:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1621965765; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=16h1rQoTAT1Aa5liJB+A86gMhj9S1AFWAM4Se7eBmp8=; b=hWSHkUnAw6kGQkYimN8h3NRyN4XL45u7ymhFURvu5bKYiwDbhH5sQoPpD6CzPdYTBjo/LV XcR83K31Wii0L730AhzKZ6FZNxZix7rcOx85DPnK+rutJcFHziL65QHtLaVGLKDAggwarT YosyhpPPw3qwa3/Wy6qOr3JlZ30FUoA= Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 20:02:44 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna" Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "M K, Muralidhara" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/MCE/AMD, EDAC/mce_amd: Add new SMCA bank types. Message-ID: References: <20210511152538.148084-1-nchatrad@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 04:41:25PM +0000, Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna wrote: > [naveenk:] There is a possibility for a heterogenous system with both > the SMCA_UMC and SMCA_UMC_V2 variant of controllers to exist. Wait, what? You can have systems with *both* UMCs in the same coherent fabric and thus the OS can see UMCs of both types on the same system? Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette