linux-edac.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Christopher BeSerra <beserra@amazon.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Provide sysfs interface to show CMCI storm state
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:35:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLaaLws+4FEHOqQs@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601200505.966849-1-tony.luck@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:05:05PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> Scripts that process error logs can do better if they know whether
> Linux is executing in CMCI storm mode (only polling and reporting
> some errors instead of trying to report them all). While it is possible
> to parse the console log for:
> 
> 	CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
> 	CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
> 
> messages, that is error prone.
> 
> Add a new file to sysfs to report the current storm count.
> 
> Reported-by: Christopher BeSerra <beserra@amazon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> RFC questions:
> 1) Is there a better way to do this?

Probably.

But I'm unclear as to what this whole use case is. The very first
"Scripts that process error logs" already sounds like a bad idea - I'd
expect userspace consumers to open the trace_mce_record() and get the
MCE records from there. And in that case CMCI storm shouldn't matter...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-01 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01 20:05 [RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Provide sysfs interface to show CMCI storm state Tony Luck
2021-06-01 20:35 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-06-01 20:40   ` Luck, Tony
2021-06-03 22:48     ` BeSerra, Christopher
2021-06-04  9:16       ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLaaLws+4FEHOqQs@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=beserra@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).