From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01443C28CC0 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92B72075B for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726140AbfE2KNV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 06:13:21 -0400 Received: from ZXSHCAS2.zhaoxin.com ([203.148.12.82]:58568 "EHLO ZXSHCAS2.zhaoxin.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726024AbfE2KNV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 06:13:21 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 903 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 May 2019 06:13:20 EDT Received: from zxbjmbx2.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.164) by ZXSHCAS2.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1261.35; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:58:09 +0800 Received: from zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) by zxbjmbx2.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1261.35; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:58:08 +0800 Received: from zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com ([fe80::b41a:737:a784:b70d]) by zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com ([fe80::b41a:737:a784:b70d%16]) with mapi id 15.01.1261.035; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:58:08 +0800 From: Tony W Wang-oc To: "tipbot@zytor.com" CC: "ashok.raj@intel.com" , "bp@suse.de" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , David Wang Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don' t participate in rendezvous process Thread-Topic: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don' t participate in rendezvous process Thread-Index: AdUV/LHofhz829fxQm+1FlrtATZuKw== Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 09:58:08 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.32.64.23] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Hi, This patch requires all #MC exception errors set MCG_STATUS_RIPV = 1? Because on offline CPUs, for #MC exception errors set MCG_STATUS_RIPV = 0 (like "Recoverable-not-continuable SRAR Type" Errors), this patch doesn't seem to work. if this patch's "return; " in a wrong place? Thanks Tony W Wang-oc