From: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org
Cc: leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
lersek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64/efi: base UEFI mapping permissions on region attributes
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:50:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435675848.21009.10.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435659443-17625-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 12:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Currently, we infer the UEFI memory region mapping permissions
> from the memory region type (i.e., runtime services code are
> mapped RWX and runtime services data mapped RW-). This appears to
> work fine but is not entirely UEFI spec compliant. So instead, use
> the designated permission attributes to decide how these regions
> should be mapped.
>
> Since UEFIv2.5 introduces a new EFI_MEMORY_RO permission attribute,
> and redefines EFI_MEMORY_WP as a cacheability attribute, use only
> the former as a read-only attribute. For setting the PXN bit, the
> corresponding EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> index ab21e0d58278..5dcab58d5d30 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> @@ -247,20 +247,30 @@ static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
> memrange_efi_to_native(&paddr, &npages);
> size = npages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - pr_info(" EFI remap 0x%016llx => %p\n",
> - md->phys_addr, (void *)md->virt_addr);
> -
> - /*
> - * Only regions of type EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE need to be
> - * executable, everything else can be mapped with the XN bits
> - * set.
> - */
> if (!is_normal_ram(md))
> prot = __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE);
> - else if (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
> - prot = PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
> else
> - prot = PAGE_KERNEL;
> + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
> +
> + /*
> + * On 64 KB granule kernels, only use strict permissions when
> + * the region does not share a 64 KB page frame with another
> + * region at either end.
> + */
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES) ||
> + !(md->virt_addr % PAGE_SIZE ||
> + (md->phys_addr + md->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE) % PAGE_SIZE)) {
I think this would read easier with:
(PAGE_ALIGNED(md->virt_addr) &&
PAGE_ALIGNED(md->phys_addr + md->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE))) {
> +
> + if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RO)
> + prot |= __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY);
> + if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_XP)
> + prot |= __pgprot(PTE_PXN);
> + }
> +
> + pr_info(" EFI remap 0x%016llx => %p (R%c%c)\n",
> + md->phys_addr, (void *)md->virt_addr,
> + prot & __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY) ? '-' : 'W',
> + prot & __pgprot(PTE_PXN) ? '-' : 'X');
You can't maninulate pgprot_t directly like that. It will
break STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS. You need to use __pgprot_modify()
and/or pgprot_val().
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c: In function ‘efi_virtmap_init’:
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c:266:10: error: invalid operands to binary | (have ‘pgprot_t’ and ‘pgprot_t’)
prot |= __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY);
^
...
(In trying that, I see there are a number of other places which
need some STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS fixing)
>
> create_pgd_mapping(&efi_mm, paddr, md->virt_addr, size, prot);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 10:17 [PATCH 0/2] arm64/efi: adapt to UEFI 2.5 properties table changes Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1435659443-17625-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-30 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64/efi: base UEFI mapping permissions on region attributes Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1435659443-17625-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-30 14:50 ` Mark Salter [this message]
[not found] ` <1435675848.21009.10.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-30 14:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-30 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64/efi: don't pad between EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435675848.21009.10.camel@redhat.com \
--to=msalter-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lersek-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).