linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] efi: Add a flags parameter to efi_memory_map
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 16:40:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157835762748.1456824.5246139429550635887.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157835762222.1456824.290100196815539830.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

In preparation for garbage collecting dynamically allocated efi memory
maps, where the allocation method of memblock vs slab needs to be
recalled, convert the existing 'late' flag into a 'flags' bitmask.

Arrange for the flag to be passed via 'struct efi_memory_map_data'. This
structure grows additional flags in follow-on changes.

Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/efi.h           |    4 +++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
index 38b686c67b17..4f98eb12c172 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
@@ -52,21 +52,20 @@ phys_addr_t __init efi_memmap_alloc(unsigned int num_entries)
 /**
  * __efi_memmap_init - Common code for mapping the EFI memory map
  * @data: EFI memory map data
- * @late: Use early or late mapping function?
  *
  * This function takes care of figuring out which function to use to
  * map the EFI memory map in efi.memmap based on how far into the boot
  * we are.
  *
- * During bootup @late should be %false since we only have access to
- * the early_memremap*() functions as the vmalloc space isn't setup.
- * Once the kernel is fully booted we can fallback to the more robust
- * memremap*() API.
+ * During bootup EFI_MEMMAP_LATE in data->flags should be clear since we
+ * only have access to the early_memremap*() functions as the vmalloc
+ * space isn't setup.  Once the kernel is fully booted we can fallback
+ * to the more robust memremap*() API.
  *
  * Returns zero on success, a negative error code on failure.
  */
 static int __init
-__efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
+__efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data)
 {
 	struct efi_memory_map map;
 	phys_addr_t phys_map;
@@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
 
 	phys_map = data->phys_map;
 
-	if (late)
+	if (data->flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE)
 		map.map = memremap(phys_map, data->size, MEMREMAP_WB);
 	else
 		map.map = early_memremap(phys_map, data->size);
@@ -92,7 +91,7 @@ __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
 
 	map.desc_version = data->desc_version;
 	map.desc_size = data->desc_size;
-	map.late = late;
+	map.flags = data->flags;
 
 	set_bit(EFI_MEMMAP, &efi.flags);
 
@@ -111,9 +110,10 @@ __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
 int __init efi_memmap_init_early(struct efi_memory_map_data *data)
 {
 	/* Cannot go backwards */
-	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.late);
+	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE);
 
-	return __efi_memmap_init(data, false);
+	data->flags = 0;
+	return __efi_memmap_init(data);
 }
 
 void __init efi_memmap_unmap(void)
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init efi_memmap_unmap(void)
 	if (!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))
 		return;
 
-	if (!efi.memmap.late) {
+	if (!(efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE)) {
 		unsigned long size;
 
 		size = efi.memmap.desc_size * efi.memmap.nr_map;
@@ -162,13 +162,14 @@ int __init efi_memmap_init_late(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
 	struct efi_memory_map_data data = {
 		.phys_map = addr,
 		.size = size,
+		.flags = EFI_MEMMAP_LATE,
 	};
 
 	/* Did we forget to unmap the early EFI memmap? */
 	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.map);
 
 	/* Were we already called? */
-	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.late);
+	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE);
 
 	/*
 	 * It makes no sense to allow callers to register different
@@ -178,7 +179,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_init_late(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
 	data.desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version;
 	data.desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size;
 
-	return __efi_memmap_init(&data, true);
+	return __efi_memmap_init(&data);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_init_late(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
 int __init efi_memmap_install(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int nr_map)
 {
 	struct efi_memory_map_data data;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	efi_memmap_unmap();
 
@@ -202,8 +204,9 @@ int __init efi_memmap_install(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int nr_map)
 	data.size = efi.memmap.desc_size * nr_map;
 	data.desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version;
 	data.desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size;
+	data.flags = efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE;
 
-	return __efi_memmap_init(&data, efi.memmap.late);
+	return __efi_memmap_init(&data);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index aa54586db7a5..e7e6c64469a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -786,6 +786,7 @@ struct efi_memory_map_data {
 	unsigned long size;
 	unsigned long desc_version;
 	unsigned long desc_size;
+	unsigned long flags;
 };
 
 struct efi_memory_map {
@@ -795,7 +796,8 @@ struct efi_memory_map {
 	int nr_map;
 	unsigned long desc_version;
 	unsigned long desc_size;
-	bool late;
+#define EFI_MEMMAP_LATE (1UL << 0)
+	unsigned long flags;
 };
 
 struct efi_mem_range {


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-07  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-07  0:40 [PATCH v4 0/4] efi: Fix handling of multiple efi_fake_mem= entries Dan Williams
2020-01-07  0:40 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-01-07  0:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] efi: Add tracking for dynamically allocated memmaps Dan Williams
2020-01-07  0:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] efi: Fix efi_memmap_alloc() leaks Dan Williams
2020-01-07  3:58   ` Dave Young
2020-01-07  4:24     ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07  5:18       ` Dave Young
2020-01-07 17:49         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-07  0:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] efi: Fix handling of multiple efi_fake_mem= entries Dan Williams
2020-01-07  4:04   ` Dave Young
2020-01-07  4:16     ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07  5:19       ` Dave Young
2020-01-07 17:51         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-08 21:53           ` Dan Williams
2020-01-09  9:35             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-09 19:32               ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157835762748.1456824.5246139429550635887.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).