From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86, kaslr: Use init_size instead of run_size Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 21:18:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20150309201846.GM12732@pd.tnic> References: <1425766041-6551-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1425766041-6551-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <20150309124935.GA12732@pd.tnic> <20150309200035.GK12732@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Matt Fleming , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , Baoquan He , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Kosina , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Josh Triplett , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Junjie Mao List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:06:00PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Yes. Just to emphasize that " We need to make sure [z_extra_offset, > init_size) will fit ZO" So you want to say: "We need to make sure the compressed kernel fits in the interval [z_extra_offset, z_extra_offset + init_size)" ? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --