linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 104/140] x86/platform/UV: Fix support for EFI_OLD_MEMMAP after BIOS callback updates
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:22:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161026122224.839245613@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161026122220.384323763@linuxfoundation.org>

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>

commit caef78b6cdeddf4ad364f95910bba6b43b8eb9bf upstream.

Some time ago, we brought our UV BIOS callback code up to speed with the
new EFI memory mapping scheme, in commit:

    d1be84a232e3 ("x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use efi_call_virt_pointer()")

By leveraging some changes that I made to a few of the EFI runtime
callback mechanisms, in commit:

    80e75596079f ("efi: Convert efi_call_virt() to efi_call_virt_pointer()")

This got everything running smoothly on UV, with the new EFI mapping
code.  However, this left one, small loose end, in that EFI_OLD_MEMMAP
(a.k.a. efi=old_map) will no longer work on UV, on kernels that include
the aforementioned changes.

At the time this was not a major issue (in fact, it still really isn't),
but there's no reason that EFI_OLD_MEMMAP *shouldn't* work on our
systems.  This commit adds a check into uv_bios_call(), to see if we have
the EFI_OLD_MEMMAP bit set in efi.flags.  If it is set, we fall back to
using our old callback method, which uses efi_call() directly on the __va()
of our function pointer.

Signed-off-by: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476928131-170101-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
@@ -40,7 +40,15 @@ s64 uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which,
 		 */
 		return BIOS_STATUS_UNIMPLEMENTED;
 
-	ret = efi_call_virt_pointer(tab, function, (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
+	/*
+	 * If EFI_OLD_MEMMAP is set, we need to fall back to using our old EFI
+	 * callback method, which uses efi_call() directly, with the kernel page tables:
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(test_bit(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP, &efi.flags)))
+		ret = efi_call((void *)__va(tab->function), (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
+	else
+		ret = efi_call_virt_pointer(tab, function, (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_call);

           reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20161026122220.384323763@linuxfoundation.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161026122224.839245613@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).