From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F09C352A3 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B4D2082F for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="V6RIg5lF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727665AbgBNAih (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:38:37 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196]:40028 "EHLO mail-qk1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727604AbgBNAig (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:38:36 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id b7so7618380qkl.7 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:38:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wGH4VY/3ugpp7nzWpAp09Rovcx+O4RdGGz99VfpVE0k=; b=V6RIg5lFKn8SGTXOEVEEQWPnDFJIa4x7oTbMlHJPCCvjD1SQumScY4+/x01VueDwjQ oX1sqPAK7GOJLWeGDhHeh+x4SzW2+6F002PxORIApjUQlam4ShwKYf7hn8v3+BCTkbnB Vv+5WZp2o3wgLsnoZomZ1m/28AlD/pQDDszTehbmWVOMF9Y1EZGBOoxVYpSeNVJfzder XAZCrlEA+5/tbwlq8Bmx2q0HIIXVmigmKsxZD/IVu2peOeOZqvUkqFZmgrjNC1k2ZMbl Rt633Tp+AzgUnQ66c0wShyM3HVZooGqY/YjaRTtm6j+fW/uRBT741KXKRSl3+vZkt4nw oMGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wGH4VY/3ugpp7nzWpAp09Rovcx+O4RdGGz99VfpVE0k=; b=JfbMKlPF5VavRRiqnIlSuRt9ktTG0dbio7SPokjrOEaOJyzMqQzPVgZrtxIgYaWCg2 4miMmbuqrXOg+Hch28pG3eyWHN3eNMgUe0Byl8C4ETr7pkR3RKyDEyUKHOuA4Ohc5PGZ H45rdpjlpDXrjQxwjMoNL0fFHPh524OMsQCJt79XztSBKq10voA6xqH12e+MGmnc8kgA 4TVevM2bM2YWsBhV3rv3Txult0+HI2PG8c5e020HTimb+2i/R1iyldkX0Dx97ncEbhMf igxukpCwyPr9GPfl6BM7bStSEm1xh4xRgHt2a4ZZXQThQGgZuKT4igEAmLD8ldT41eNZ kQZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWSlGVPY3o5/XWgxVmwp5XOrzs37mPCLvbQSmdRLonPn6rhHe+H Y1cQdAvk45zjL0zDZ4ODBHw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwfnW4Vs+QhrRGYRew3FAdJ0vrdZDXZKbEZ0z9MgIlJXH1IiWUuhUEyeD7TvJXJg9PvvaQgiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:bd85:: with SMTP id n127mr240986qkf.113.1581640714660; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rani.riverdale.lan ([2001:470:1f07:5f3::b55f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t23sm2278596qtp.82.2020.02.13.16.38.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:38:34 -0800 (PST) From: Arvind Sankar X-Google-Original-From: Arvind Sankar Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:38:32 -0500 To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Arvind Sankar , linux-efi , linux-arm-kernel , Laszlo Ersek , Leif Lindholm , Peter Jones , Matthew Garrett , Alexander Graf , Daniel Kiper , Hans de Goede , Michael Brown , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] efi/x86: add support for generic EFI mixed mode boot Message-ID: <20200214003832.GA3073156@rani.riverdale.lan> References: <20200213145928.7047-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20200213175317.GC1400002@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200213184752.GA1424509@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200214001048.GA3054227@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200214001257.GB3054227@rani.riverdale.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-efi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:21:30AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > I see the value of having a 64-bit image that can boot natively on > 32-bit firmware, but I am not expecting any buy in from the distros > for this scheme. > Ok.