linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 411/542] efi/arm: Defer probe of PCIe backed efifb on DT systems
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:46:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214154854.6746-411-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214154854.6746-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 64c8a0cd0a535891d5905c3a1651150f0f141439 ]

The new of_devlink support breaks PCIe probing on ARM platforms booting
via UEFI if the firmware exposes a EFI framebuffer that is backed by a
PCI device. The reason is that the probing order gets reversed,
resulting in a resource conflict on the framebuffer memory window when
the PCIe probes last, causing it to give up entirely.

Given that we rely on PCI quirks to deal with EFI framebuffers that get
moved around in memory, we cannot simply drop the memory reservation, so
instead, let's use the device link infrastructure to register this
dependency, and force the probing to occur in the expected order.

Co-developed-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200113172245.27925-9-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
index 904fa09e6a6b0..d99f5b0c8a090 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
@@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)	"efi: " fmt
 
 #include <linux/efi.h>
+#include <linux/fwnode.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/memblock.h>
 #include <linux/mm_types.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/screen_info.h>
@@ -276,15 +278,112 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
 		efi_memmap_unmap();
 }
 
+static bool efifb_overlaps_pci_range(const struct of_pci_range *range)
+{
+	u64 fb_base = screen_info.lfb_base;
+
+	if (screen_info.capabilities & VIDEO_CAPABILITY_64BIT_BASE)
+		fb_base |= (u64)(unsigned long)screen_info.ext_lfb_base << 32;
+
+	return fb_base >= range->cpu_addr &&
+	       fb_base < (range->cpu_addr + range->size);
+}
+
+static struct device_node *find_pci_overlap_node(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+
+	for_each_node_by_type(np, "pci") {
+		struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
+		struct of_pci_range range;
+		int err;
+
+		err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, np);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_warn("of_pci_range_parser_init() failed: %d\n", err);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range)
+			if (efifb_overlaps_pci_range(&range))
+				return np;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * If the efifb framebuffer is backed by a PCI graphics controller, we have
+ * to ensure that this relation is expressed using a device link when
+ * running in DT mode, or the probe order may be reversed, resulting in a
+ * resource reservation conflict on the memory window that the efifb
+ * framebuffer steals from the PCIe host bridge.
+ */
+static int efifb_add_links(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+			   struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct device_node *sup_np;
+	struct device *sup_dev;
+
+	sup_np = find_pci_overlap_node();
+
+	/*
+	 * If there's no PCI graphics controller backing the efifb, we are
+	 * done here.
+	 */
+	if (!sup_np)
+		return 0;
+
+	sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(&sup_np->fwnode);
+	of_node_put(sup_np);
+
+	/*
+	 * Return -ENODEV if the PCI graphics controller device hasn't been
+	 * registered yet.  This ensures that efifb isn't allowed to probe
+	 * and this function is retried again when new devices are
+	 * registered.
+	 */
+	if (!sup_dev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	/*
+	 * If this fails, retrying this function at a later point won't
+	 * change anything. So, don't return an error after this.
+	 */
+	if (!device_link_add(dev, sup_dev, 0))
+		dev_warn(dev, "device_link_add() failed\n");
+
+	put_device(sup_dev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct fwnode_operations efifb_fwnode_ops = {
+	.add_links = efifb_add_links,
+};
+
+static struct fwnode_handle efifb_fwnode = {
+	.ops = &efifb_fwnode_ops,
+};
+
 static int __init register_gop_device(void)
 {
-	void *pd;
+	struct platform_device *pd;
+	int err;
 
 	if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
 		return 0;
 
-	pd = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "efi-framebuffer", 0,
-					   &screen_info, sizeof(screen_info));
-	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pd);
+	pd = platform_device_alloc("efi-framebuffer", 0);
+	if (!pd)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI))
+		pd->dev.fwnode = &efifb_fwnode;
+
+	err = platform_device_add_data(pd, &screen_info, sizeof(screen_info));
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return platform_device_add(pd);
 }
 subsys_initcall(register_gop_device);
-- 
2.20.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-14 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200214154854.6746-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-02-14 15:40 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 063/542] efi/x86: Map the entire EFI vendor string before copying it Sasha Levin
2020-02-14 15:45 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 320/542] efi/x86: Don't panic or BUG() on non-critical error conditions Sasha Levin
2020-02-14 15:46 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200214154854.6746-411-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).