linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Sergey Shatunov <me@prok.pw>,
	hpa@zytor.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	initramfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Donovan Tremura <neurognostic@protonmail.ch>,
	Harald Hoyer <harald@hoyer.xyz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot/compressed/64: Remove .bss/.pgtable from bzImage
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 19:21:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200406172102.GF2520@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXG+34-bK1XuxX5VopkRt1SV1ewUAEmif+aQj5cJQ=9vbA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:29:18PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > What do you think of the other problem -- that's actually worse to fix,
> > as it won't just be when kaslr is disabled, the startup_64 code will do
> > relocation to the end of init_size and clobber the initrd before getting
> > to the kaslr code, so it will break as soon as the firmware loads the
> > "unified kernel image" at a 2Mb-aligned address. The only thing I can
> > think of is to just unconditionally call efi_relocate_kernel if we were
> > entered via handover_entry?
> >
> 
> Yes, that seems to be the most robust approach.

The commit in question is this one:

d5cdf4cfeac9 ("efi/x86: Don't relocate the kernel unless necessary")

I presume?

I'm guessing it can simply be reverted as it doesn't fix a bug but it is
just an optimization... provided I'm not missing something, of course.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-06 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200109150218.16544-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
     [not found] ` <20200405154245.11972-1-me@prok.pw>
2020-04-05 23:18   ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot/compressed/64: Remove .bss/.pgtable from bzImage Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06  0:00     ` Sergey Shatunov
2020-04-06  3:51       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06  7:32         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-06  8:47           ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-06  9:11             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-06 11:20               ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-06 13:22                 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06 13:29                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-06 16:01                     ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06 16:22                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-06 16:52                         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06 16:59                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-06 18:06                             ` [PATCH 1/2] efi/x86: Move efi stub globals from .bss to .data Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06 18:06                               ` [PATCH 2/2] efi/x86: Always relocate the kernel for EFI handover entry Arvind Sankar
2020-04-06 18:29                               ` [PATCH 1/2] efi/x86: Move efi stub globals from .bss to .data Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-08  7:43                               ` Dave Young
2020-04-08  7:49                                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-09 14:39                                   ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-09 14:47                                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-09 16:35                                       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-10 14:47                                         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-10 15:26                                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-14 14:57                                             ` Daniel Kiper
2020-04-10 11:26                               ` Thomas Meyer
2020-04-10 14:38                                 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-04-11  8:50                                   ` Thomas Meyer
2020-04-06 17:21                     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-04-06  8:44     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/boot/compressed/64: Remove .bss/.pgtable from bzImage Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-06 12:36       ` Sergey Shatunov
2020-04-06 13:20         ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200406172102.GF2520@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=harald@hoyer.xyz \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=initramfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@prok.pw \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neurognostic@protonmail.ch \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).