From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fixes
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:17:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710111724.m4jaci73pykalxys@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710110034.zthb7lctf7xwj2yt@box>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:00:34PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I forgot why we care though -- is there any behavior of gnu11
> > that we prefer over the gnu99 behavior, or is it just going with
> > the times because it's the right thing to do? All the interesting
> > features of c11 seem to also be available as extensions in
> > gcc-4.9's gnu89, though I could not find a definite list of the
> > differences.
>
> Last time (llist_entry_safe() thread) it came up due to local variables in
> loops feature that is not available for gnu89. Both gnu99 and gnu11 is
> fine.
Same for anonymous structs/unions. I used to have a use case for that
in struct efi_dev_path in include/linux/efi.h, but Ard refactored it
in a gnu89-compatible way for v5.7 with db8952e7094f.
(BTW, revisiting that commit I think it should have been broken into
smaller pieces, in particular the efi_get_device_by_path() argument
and #ifdef change should have gone into a separate commit.)
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-28 18:26 [GIT PULL] EFI fixes Ingo Molnar
2020-06-28 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-28 19:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-28 19:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-07-08 16:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-09 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 9:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-09 10:34 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-07-10 10:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-10 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-07-10 11:17 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2020-06-28 22:05 ` pr-tracker-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-25 10:32 Ingo Molnar
2020-07-25 22:30 ` pr-tracker-bot
2020-03-02 7:10 Ingo Molnar
2020-03-03 23:35 ` pr-tracker-bot
2020-01-18 17:16 Ingo Molnar
2020-01-18 21:05 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-12-17 11:09 Ingo Molnar
2019-12-17 19:20 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-11-01 17:43 Ingo Molnar
2019-11-01 19:10 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-10-12 13:01 Ingo Molnar
2019-10-12 22:35 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-06-29 8:23 Ingo Molnar
2019-06-29 11:45 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-06-02 17:35 Ingo Molnar
2019-06-02 18:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
2018-12-09 21:59 Ingo Molnar
2018-12-09 23:45 ` pr-tracker-bot
2018-11-17 10:51 Ingo Molnar
2018-11-18 20:05 ` pr-tracker-bot
2017-10-27 19:10 Ingo Molnar
2017-06-02 6:46 Ingo Molnar
2017-03-07 20:21 Ingo Molnar
2017-02-02 20:54 Ingo Molnar
2017-01-15 9:53 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710111724.m4jaci73pykalxys@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).