From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AC9C2D0E0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C194F21D7D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="OoPBYUiC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726423AbgIOIYh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:24:37 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:42312 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726303AbgIOIQD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:16:03 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0e42005bd5729a6296255f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0e:4200:5bd5:729a:6296:255f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 4E2721EC058C; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:15:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1600157716; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=yEJCfXwRj3yq0x1l28tMtuPd1vDO0s2J9nk983qf9F0=; b=OoPBYUiCysYxcynou0G8+BD+lVSt+BH4l01auVyJjRXkXNcuz+g9OrEtK3u9E1pH+Wa1NF 1rXMIEuOkLoPDF1LdzHmvbOe/QmjpelvDafamvArRTUj0DIzP6l+49cGrIisCTKSGYYnXG wlZkhrnXs+6tyvvnuK00dbdNBw5cUxE= Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:15:14 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, Tony Luck , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Ard Biesheuvel , Yazen Ghannam Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cper, apei, mce: Pass x86 CPER through the MCA handling chain Message-ID: <20200915081514.GB14436@zn.tnic> References: <20200903234531.162484-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> <20200903234531.162484-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> <20200914153024.GC680@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-efi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 04:16:10PM -0500, Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa wrote: > May be something like apei_smca_report_x86_error? Or probably an additional > SMCA-specific function call inside this generic APEI and MCA function call? apei_smca_report_x86_error() sounds ok. If there's need for any additional MCA handling from BERT, then that can be extended/refactored then. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette