linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: efi: avoid BUILD_BUG_ON() for non-constant p4d_index
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:31:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205183135.GA3393009@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdnAoNrbAs2kLng-k3L8j4hGS5HtJUv3L-pVwi+5dARQfg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:27:54AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:35 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > x86_64 all{mod,yes}config with clang are going to ship broken in 5.11.
> >
> > Dunno, it is still broken here even with those build assertions removed. And it
> > ain't even an all{mod,yes}config - just my machine's config with
> >
> > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN=y
> > # CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP is not set
> > CONFIG_CC_HAS_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y
> > CONFIG_CC_HAS_UBSAN_ARRAY_BOUNDS=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_ARRAY_BOUNDS=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_SHIFT=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_DIV_ZERO=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_SIGNED_OVERFLOW=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_UNSIGNED_OVERFLOW=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_BOOL=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_ENUM=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT=y
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL=y
> > # CONFIG_TEST_UBSAN is not set
> >
> > and clang-10:
> >
> > lib/strncpy_from_user.o: warning: objtool: strncpy_from_user()+0x253: call to __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled
> > lib/strnlen_user.o: warning: objtool: strnlen_user()+0x244: call to __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled
> > ld: init/main.o: in function `kmalloc':
> > /home/boris/kernel/linux/./include/linux/slab.h:557: undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption'
> > ld: init/initramfs.o: in function `kmalloc':
> > /home/boris/kernel/linux/./include/linux/slab.h:552: undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption'
> > ld: init/initramfs.o: in function `kmalloc_large':
> > /home/boris/kernel/linux/./include/linux/slab.h:481: undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption'
> > ld: init/initramfs.o: in function `kmalloc':
> > /home/boris/kernel/linux/./include/linux/slab.h:552: undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption'
> > ld: /home/boris/kernel/linux/./include/linux/slab.h:552: undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption'
> > ld: init/initramfs.o:/home/boris/kernel/linux/./include/linux/slab.h:552: more undefined references to `__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption' follow
> > ld: mm/mremap.o: in function `get_extent':
> > /home/boris/kernel/linux/mm/mremap.c:355: undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_327'
> 
> ^ this one is https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201230154104.522605-1-arnd@kernel.org/.
> Trying to get the last of these tracked down.  I think there were some
> changes to UBSAN configs that weren't tested with clang before merged.

The rest of these should be resolved by
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205023257.NJnJdyyZk%25akpm@linux-foundation.org/,
which is currently on its way to Linus.

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-07 22:34 [PATCH] x86: efi: avoid BUILD_BUG_ON() for non-constant p4d_index Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 22:42 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-01-13 17:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-15 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-15 18:32   ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-01-15 19:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-15 19:11       ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-15 19:18         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-15 19:54           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-15 20:12             ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-15 20:32               ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-15 19:07 ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-15 20:27   ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-16 16:34     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-18 20:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-18 21:42         ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-20  9:33           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-20 11:44             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-03 18:51             ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-02-03 20:29               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-04 10:51                 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 10:59                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-04 19:16                   ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-02-04 21:43                   ` Arvind Sankar
2021-02-04 22:13                     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-05  0:08                       ` Arvind Sankar
2021-02-05 11:39                         ` [PATCH] x86/efi: Remove EFI PGD build time checks Borislav Petkov
2021-02-05 11:57                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-05 18:14                           ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-02-05 18:56                           ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-02-05 10:34               ` [PATCH] x86: efi: avoid BUILD_BUG_ON() for non-constant p4d_index Borislav Petkov
2021-02-05 18:27                 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-02-05 18:31                   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-01-20 11:26           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-01-20 11:06   ` Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210205183135.GA3393009@localhost \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).