linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Eric Richter <erichte@linux.ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] efi: Only print errors about failing to get certs if EFI vars are found
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:35:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30819cad-1a00-1ea7-13cf-d1d15c0fa96c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c60e016-fb30-b33d-39c6-ea30a4f777cb@redhat.com>

On 28.02.20 10:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 28.02.20 10:19, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 17.02.20 12:39, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> If CONFIG_LOAD_UEFI_KEYS is enabled, the kernel attempts to load the certs
>>> from the db, dbx and MokListRT EFI variables into the appropriate keyrings.
>>>
>>> But it just assumes that the variables will be present and prints an error
>>> if the certs can't be loaded, even when is possible that the variables may
>>> not exist. For example the MokListRT variable will only be present if shim
>>> is used.
>>>
>>> So only print an error message about failing to get the certs list from an
>>> EFI variable if this is found. Otherwise these printed errors just pollute
>>> the kernel log ring buffer with confusing messages like the following:
>>>
>>> [    5.427251] Couldn't get size: 0x800000000000000e
>>> [    5.427261] MODSIGN: Couldn't get UEFI db list
>>> [    5.428012] Couldn't get size: 0x800000000000000e
>>> [    5.428023] Couldn't get UEFI MokListRT
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>>> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>
>> This patch seems to break a very basic x86-64 QEMU setup (booting
>> upstream kernel with a F31 initrd - are you running basic boot tests?).
>> Luckily, it only took me 5 minutes to identify this patch. Reverting
>> this patch from linux-next fixes it for me.
>>
>>
>> [    1.042766] Loaded X.509 cert 'Build time autogenerated kernel key: 6625d6e34255935276d2c9851e2458909a4bcd69'
>> [    1.044314] zswap: loaded using pool lzo/zbud
>> [    1.045663] Key type ._fscrypt registered
>> [    1.046154] Key type .fscrypt registered
>> [    1.046524] Key type fscrypt-provisioning registered
>> [    1.051178] Key type big_key registered
>> [    1.055108] Key type encrypted registered
>> [    1.055513] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
>> [    1.056172] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
>> [    1.056706] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
>> [    1.057367] PGD 0 P4D 0 
>> [    1.057729] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP NOPTI
>> [    1.058249] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc3-next-20200228+ #79
>> [    1.059167] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.4
>> [    1.060230] RIP: 0010:0x0
>> [    1.060478] Code: Bad RIP value.
>> [    1.060786] RSP: 0018:ffffbc7880637d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
>> [    1.061281] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffbc7880637dc8
>> [    1.061954] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffbc7880637df0 RDI: ffffffffa73c40be
>> [    1.062611] RBP: ffffbc7880637e20 R08: ffffbc7880637dac R09: ffffa0238f4ba6c0
>> [    1.063278] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
>> [    1.063956] R13: ffffa024bdd6f660 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
>> [    1.064609] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa023fdd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [    1.065360] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [    1.065900] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 00000000b1610000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> [    1.066562] Call Trace:
>> [    1.066803]  load_uefi_certs+0xc8/0x2bb
>> [    1.067171]  ? get_cert_list+0xfb/0xfb
>> [    1.067523]  do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0
>> [    1.067894]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80
>> [    1.068337]  kernel_init_freeable+0x243/0x2c2
>> [    1.068751]  ? rest_init+0x23a/0x23a
>> [    1.069095]  kernel_init+0xa/0x106
>> [    1.069416]  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
>> [    1.069759] Modules linked in:
>> [    1.070050] CR2: 0000000000000000
>> [    1.070361] ---[ end trace fcce9bb4feb21d99 ]---
>>
>>
> 
> Sorry, wrong mail identified, the patch is actually
> 
> commit 6b75d54d5258ccd655387a00bbe1b00f92f4d965
> Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Date:   Sun Feb 16 19:46:25 2020 +0100
> 
>     integrity: Check properly whether EFI GetVariable() is available
> 
>     Testing the value of the efi.get_variable function pointer is not
> 
> which made it work. (not even able to find that patch on lkml ...)

To clarify for Ard, your patch breaks a basic QEMU setup (see above,
NULL pointer dereference). Reverting your patch from linux-next makes it
work again.


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-17 11:39 [RESEND PATCH v2] efi: Only print errors about failing to get certs if EFI vars are found Javier Martinez Canillas
2020-02-17 13:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-28  9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-28  9:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-28  9:35     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-28  9:35     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-02-28  9:39       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-28  9:43         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-28  9:44           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-28  9:58             ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30819cad-1a00-1ea7-13cf-d1d15c0fa96c@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=erichte@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).