From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: "Kuppuswamy,
Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 12:08:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <943223d5-5949-6aba-8a49-0b07078d68e1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210812100724.t4cdh7xbkuqgnsc3@box.shutemov.name>
On 8/12/21 5:07 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:52:55AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 8/11/21 7:19 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 02:48:54PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
...
>>> Looking at code agains, now I *think* the reason is accessing a global
>>> variable from __startup_64() inside TDX version of prot_guest_has().
>>>
>>> __startup_64() is special. If you access any global variable you need to
>>> use fixup_pointer(). See comment before __startup_64().
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how you get away with accessing sme_me_mask directly from
>>> there. Any clues? Maybe just a luck and complier generates code just right
>>> for your case, I donno.
>>
>> Hmm... yeah, could be that the compiler is using rip-relative addressing
>> for it because it lives in the .data section?
>
> I guess. It has to be fixed. It may break with complier upgrade or any
> random change around the code.
I'll look at doing that separate from this series.
>
> BTW, does it work with clang for you?
I haven't tried with clang, I'll check on that.
Thanks,
Tom
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 22:26 [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-28 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-02 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-11 14:53 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 15:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29 14:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:35 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-09 21:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-09 22:08 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-30 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-09 21:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 12:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-09 22:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 18:45 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-10 19:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-10 20:09 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-11 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-12 10:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-08-13 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-08-13 20:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-02 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] s390/mm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-07-28 11:50 ` Christian König
2021-08-09 1:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-09 22:16 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=943223d5-5949-6aba-8a49-0b07078d68e1@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).