From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2224BC4BA21 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC1F20656 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="sP90uYz+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727185AbgBZTVB (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:21:01 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:35750 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727128AbgBZTVB (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:21:01 -0500 Received: from [10.137.112.111] (unknown [131.107.147.111]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01E7E20B9C02; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 01E7E20B9C02 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1582744860; bh=W5JGlWfBcPkXP7GPkcMwkkT4Bh9pLTkThoAlCVPwyRQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=sP90uYz+6s+BSypzgsp9eYDewZcb3nzcjwkoUZPDiJcQlBfut+kdr1zeFmQHWh1/Z +9CCAIkM1znTN/EcRfAb2OLHvdncSDza5XnDZ3KvVN53OHh+iPP6ONDSj9fX0B2V4E ZdtGrhFm20v1aAMh41WfyHskx9YNOblByQHjRXtQ= Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: add a new CONFIG for loading arch-specific policies To: Nayna Jain , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Martin Schwidefsky , Philipp Rudo , Michael Ellerman , zohar@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1582744207-25969-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Message-ID: <94fe39a9-db9e-211d-d9b7-4cfe1a270e6f@linux.microsoft.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:28 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1582744207-25969-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-efi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Hi Nayna, > + > +config IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT > + bool > + depends on IMA > + depends on IMA_ARCH_POLICY > + default n > + help > + This option is selected by architectures to enable secure and/or > + trusted boot based on IMA runtime policies. > Why is the default for this new config "n"? Is there any reason to not turn on this config if both IMA and IMA_ARCH_POLICY are set to y? thanks, -lakshmi