From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate base load address calculation" Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:15:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1425766041-6551-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1425766041-6551-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <20150313122756.GA28855@gmail.com> <20150314075357.GA8319@gmail.com> <20150314095923.GA3114@pd.tnic> <20150316100628.GD22995@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Matt Fleming , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , Baoquan He , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , Josh Triplett , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Junjie Mao List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> From: Borislav Petkov >> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:57:56 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate base load address calculation" >> >> This reverts commit f47233c2d34f243ecdaac179c3408a39ff9216a7. ... > > Agreed. Let's work on a better refresh for 4.1+. The fix attempts were > quite chaotic. Then what is the plan for 4.1+ ? Are you still going to use kaslr_setup_data? If if is YES, then we should have patch1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/15/7 patch2: f47233c2d34f243ecdaac179c3408a39ff9216a7 + fix from https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/15/8 If you are not going to have setup_data and f47233c2d34f243ecdaac179c3408a39ff9216a7 back, please let me know. I may need to change patch in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/15/7, So it only have ADDON_ZO_SIZE with pgtable only and we can go on with kaslr on 64bit above 4G support. Thanks Yinghai