linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:33:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-1MfUJiF5idd0KoziUxhrDStmRwXQZHuX+gwnJvq083g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151026210235.GA3526@codeblueprint.co.uk>

On 27 October 2015 at 06:02, Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct, at 10:37:46AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> After looking at the original (already merged) patch 11/11 again, I
>> realize this is still not right: the problem is that efi_memory_map's
>> phys_map member uses a void* type to hold a physical address, which
>> happens to be correct in the normal case even when phys_addr_t is
>> larger than void* (like on ARM with LPAE enabled) since the address it
>> holds is the address of an allocation performed by the firmware, which
>> only uses 1:1 addressable memory.
>>
>> However, overwriting memmap.phys_map with a value produced my
>> memblock_alloc() is problematic, since the allocation may be above 4
>> GB on 32-bit (L)PAE platforms. So the correct way to do this would be
>> to set the memblock limit to 4GB before memblock_alloc() on 32-bit
>> platforms, and restore it afterwards. This is a bit of a kludge,
>> though, and it would be more correct to change the type of
>> efi_memory_map::phys_map to phys_addr_t, although I don't know what
>> the potential fallout of that change is. Matt?
>
> I think that should be fine. The only potentially tricky situation we
> could encounter is where 32-bit x86 firmware uses PAE but the kernel
> is built without support.
>
> But that's not something I've ever seen enabled in the firmware and
> there's a bunch of assumptions in the kernel already that would break
> in that case.
>

Does UEFI even allow that? Even if it can describe memory over 4 GB,
it uses a flat mapping so allocations done by the stub (which
retrieves the memory map) should never reside at addresses over 4 GB.

-- 
Ard.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-27  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1445593826-4578-1-git-send-email-izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
     [not found] ` <1445593826-4578-1-git-send-email-izumi.taku-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-23  8:37   ` [PATCH v2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-23  8:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-23  9:48       ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: use correct type for struct efi_memory_map::phys_map Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]         ` <1445593697-1342-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-23  9:48           ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-23 10:27             ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]               ` <20151023102728.GA1974-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-23 10:30                 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]                   ` <20151023103022.GA2297-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-23 10:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-27 21:12                       ` Matt Fleming
2015-10-28 11:28                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-27 21:11             ` Matt Fleming
2015-10-27 21:09         ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: use correct type for struct efi_memory_map::phys_map Matt Fleming
     [not found]     ` <CAKv+Gu8WPvG5rzBB57eK1_Ehj1wB19wR=zzBDRoQbmhRfpCGng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-26 21:02       ` [PATCH v2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds Matt Fleming
2015-10-27  2:33         ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
     [not found]           ` <CAKv+Gu-1MfUJiF5idd0KoziUxhrDStmRwXQZHuX+gwnJvq083g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-27 21:08             ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu-1MfUJiF5idd0KoziUxhrDStmRwXQZHuX+gwnJvq083g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).