linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Weiser <michael@weiser.dinsnail.net>,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: update e820 about reserved EFI boot services data to fix kexec breakage
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:24:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8TcF69QNhqRJGh+A8AJ=91dfTJhRmV=J4V3ML9vQWoXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204101412.GD114697@gmail.com>

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:14, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/04/19 at 03:52pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Michael Weiser reported he got below error during a kexec rebooting:
> > > esrt: Unsupported ESRT version 2904149718861218184.
> > >
> > > The ESRT memory stays in EFI boot services data, and it was reserved
> > > in kernel via efi_mem_reserve().  The initial purpose of the reservation
> > > is to reuse the EFI boot services data across kexec reboot. For example
> > > the BGRT image data and some ESRT memory like Michael reported.
> > >
> > > But although the memory is reserved it is not updated in X86 e820 table.
> > > And kexec_file_load iterate system ram in io resource list to find places
> > > for kernel, initramfs and other stuff. In Michael's case the kexec loaded
> > > initramfs overwritten the ESRT memory and then the failure happened.
> >
> > s/overwritten/overwrote :)  If need a repost please let me know..
> >
> > >
> > > Since kexec_file_load depends on the e820 to be updated, just fix this
> > > by updating the reserved EFI boot services memory as reserved type in e820.
> > >
> > > Originally any memory descriptors with EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute are
> > > bypassed in the reservation code path because they are assumed as reserved.
> > > But the reservation is still needed for multiple kexec reboot.
> > > And it is the only possible case we come here thus just drop the code
> > > chunk then everything works without side effects.
> > >
> > > On my machine the ESRT memory sits in an EFI runtime data range, it does
> > > not trigger the problem, but I successfully tested with BGRT instead.
> > > both kexec_load and kexec_file_load work and kdump works as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>
>
> So I edited this to:
>
>  From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>
>  Michael Weiser reported he got this error during a kexec rebooting:
>
>    esrt: Unsupported ESRT version 2904149718861218184.
>
>  The ESRT memory stays in EFI boot services data, and it was reserved
>  in kernel via efi_mem_reserve().  The initial purpose of the reservation
>  is to reuse the EFI boot services data across kexec reboot. For example
>  the BGRT image data and some ESRT memory like Michael reported.
>
>  But although the memory is reserved it is not updated in the X86 E820 table,
>  and kexec_file_load() iterates system RAM in the IO resource list to find places
>  for kernel, initramfs and other stuff. In Michael's case the kexec loaded
>  initramfs overwrote the ESRT memory and then the failure happened.
>
>  Since kexec_file_load() depends on the E820 table being updated, just fix this
>  by updating the reserved EFI boot services memory as reserved type in E820.
>
>  Originally any memory descriptors with EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute are
>  bypassed in the reservation code path because they are assumed as reserved.
>
>  But the reservation is still needed for multiple kexec reboots,
>  and it is the only possible case we come here thus just drop the code
>  chunk, then everything works without side effects.
>
>  On my machine the ESRT memory sits in an EFI runtime data range, it does
>  not trigger the problem, but I successfully tested with BGRT instead.
>  both kexec_load() and kexec_file_load() work and kdump works as well.
>

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04  7:52 [PATCH] x86/efi: update e820 about reserved EFI boot services data to fix kexec breakage Dave Young
2019-12-04  7:59 ` Dave Young
2019-12-04 10:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-12-04 10:14   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-12-04 10:24     ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-12-05 10:55     ` Dave Young
2019-12-05 21:15       ` Michael Weiser
2019-12-04 11:31   ` Michael Weiser
2019-12-04 10:21 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/efi: Update e820 with " tip-bot2 for Dave Young
2019-12-28 20:54 ` [PATCH] x86/efi: update e820 about " Dan Williams
2019-12-29  6:13   ` Dan Williams
2019-12-29 14:24     ` Dave Young
2019-12-30  3:32       ` Dave Young
2019-12-30  5:55         ` Dave Young
2019-12-30  9:42     ` Dan Williams
2019-12-30 10:49       ` Dave Young
2019-12-30 20:16       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu8TcF69QNhqRJGh+A8AJ=91dfTJhRmV=J4V3ML9vQWoXA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@weiser.dinsnail.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).